Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food processing industry leads to the authors rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.
First, the authors forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods long experience has taught it how to do things better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency is entirely unfounded.
Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.
As it stands the authors argument is not compelling. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn from industries more similar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate the authors view.
副词的分类
none 可用作哪些句子成分
人称代词之主、宾格的替换
many, much
代词比较辩异 one,that 和it
指示代词
双重所有格
one/another/the other
no longer,not...any longer与no more,not...any more
不定代词
“及物动词+自身代词+介词短语”的常用结构
fairly, quite, rather, very, pretty的语法区别
much可修饰哪些词语
英语副词的句法功能
反身代词不用作定语
英语焦点副词
very, much 与 very much
anyone/any one;no one/none;every/each
物主代词
并列人称代词的排列顺序
anyone还是whoever
the用作副词的三种情形
不定代词用作状语
ago 与 before的用法区别
almost 与 nearly的语法区别
疑问代词
英语比较级和最高级前使用冠词的规律
名词性物主代词的句法功能
anywhere用法小议
英语语法-代词配套练习及答案
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |