第一宗罪:无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion , unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
第四宗罪 时地全等
The author commits the fallacy of all things are equal. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
第五宗罪 二者择一
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 可疑调查
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
印度公司制成百分百降解可食用“塑料袋”
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:28(含解析)
2016年下半年三级口译 真题参考答案及点评
川普与高科技公司高管举行“和解”会谈
让你的口语更地道的表达
如果给我三个愿望 IF I Were Given Three Wishes
中国制造 Made In China
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:22(含解析)
BBC派仨英国学生去韩国感受魔鬼教育 再次被虐
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:17(含解析)
区分五个和“教”有关的近义词
4人180天“受控生态生保系统集成试验”结束
吴恳大使在《禁止化学武器公约》第21届缔约国大会一般性辩论中的发言
工作狂不是高效员工,7个特征要自检!
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:19(含解析)
老外最常用的21个英语习语
神奇女侠性感过头 被联合国炒鱿鱼?
八大健康习惯误区你中了吗
巴黎卖连心锁向难民献爱心
2016年下半年二级口译 真题参考答案及点评
外媒:王思聪不愿接班王健林2000亿资产不要
国内英语资讯:China urges U.S. to abide by commitment on S. China Sea issue
国内英语资讯:Chinese president sends condolences to Turkish counterpart over terror attack
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:26(含解析)
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:20(含解析)
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:18(含解析)
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:30(含解析)
2017高考四川省广安市英语阅读理解一轮系列训练:29(含解析)
川普提名前得克萨斯州长佩里担任能源部长
雅虎10亿多账号遭黑客袭击
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |