第一宗罪:无因果联系
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪 样本不足
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion , unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 错误类比
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
第四宗罪 时地全等
The author commits the fallacy of all things are equal. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....
第五宗罪 二者择一
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪 可疑调查
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪 结论无据
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility
雅思阅读的三篇文章中哪篇最难?
如何应对雅思阅读中的生词问题
Paraphrase in IELTS Reading
雅思阅读Matching题:题目与选项的配对规律
雅思阅读关注新话题的必要性
雅思阅读考试中的注意事项
如何提高雅思英语阅读能力?
雅思阅读题的常见组合模式及对策
充分利用雅思阅读真题的方法
雅思阅读基本技能运用指导
雅思阅读List of headings题的解题思路
雅思阅读Heading题的解题方法
浅谈雅思阅读多选题的同题异做
雅思阅读Matching题的分类和应对策略
雅思阅读关键点:把握文章脉络
浅析雅思阅读填充句子题型
如何通过文章脉络巧解雅思阅读
雅思阅读真题词汇:英国建筑发展
浅谈拿下雅思阅读高分的软硬件
剑桥雅思6阅读难点解析:Test 3
雅思阅读基本能力:定位和同义替换
浅析雅思阅读段落细节配对题
同义转换在雅思阅读中的重要性
雅思阅读备考的四大秘籍
雅思阅读长难句句式结构分析
雅思阅读高分的四大“必杀技”
雅思阅读方法介绍:结构阅读法
雅思阅读考试常识在做题中的运用
雅思阅读必杀技炼成大法
雅思阅读题型的备考方法
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |