Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic manner depends on: the goals toward which the traits are directed, the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and the job of the individual within an organization.
A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not inconsistent per se with personal strength, energy and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving manner-for example, through pilfering or backstabbing-these traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these goals can motivate other team members, thereby advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and common purpose.
Nevertheless, overemphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy competition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.
In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement a strong team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, alt can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organizations goals.
2016秋人教PEP版英语六上Unit 1《How can I get there》(B let’s learn ^talk )ppt课件
灵宝实验小学PEP人教版四年级上Unit5(第一课时)教案
PEP三年级英语上册全册教案2
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit 2《Ways to go to school》word单元教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Unit 2《My week》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Unit 4《What can you do》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Recycle 2导学案
PEP三年级英语上册全册教案1
PEP四年级英语上册全册教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit1-2单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Unit 1《What’s he like》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit 4《I have a pen pal》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册《Recycle 1》word单元教案
PEP五年级英语上册全册教案
灵宝实验小学PEP人教版四年级上Unit4教案(1-6)
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Unit 6《In a nature park》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Unit 5《There is a big be》word单元导学案
小学PEP人教版四年级上Unit5(第四课时)教案
人教版四年级英语上册全册教案
人教版三年级上册英语全册教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册《Recycle 2》word单元教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit 6《How do you feel》word单元教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语四年级上册全册教案
2015秋人教版小学英语六年级上册1-12课时导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit 3《my weekend plan》word单元教案
2016秋人教PEP版英语四年级上册全册导学案(共73页)
2016秋人教PEP版英语六年级上册Unit 6《How do you feel》word单元导学案
2016秋人教PEP版英语六上Unit 1《How can I get there》(A let’s learn)ppt课件
2016秋人教PEP版英语五年级上册Recycle 1导学案
小学PEP人教版四年级上Unit5(第二课时)教案
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |