GMAT考试写作参考例文
Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A flat organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Which is a better way to classify and reward employees of a business: a flat organizational structure or a hierarchical structure? The speaker prefers a flat structure in which distinctions between employees based on education or experience are not used as a basis for monetary rewards. I strongly disagree with the speakers view, for two reasons.
In the first place, the speakers preference for a flat structure is based upon the claim that cooperation and collegiality among employees is more likely under this system than under a hierarchical one. However, this claim ignores our everyday experience in human interaction. Disagreements among coworkers are inevitable. Without a clear authoritative figure to resolve them and to make final decisions, disputes are more likely to go unresolved and even worsen, thereby undermining cooperation, congeniality and, ultimately, productivity and profit.
In the second place, whether or not collegiality and cooperation are best fostered by a flat organizational structure is beside the point . My main reason for rejecting an organizational structure that does not distinguish workers in terms of their abilities or experience is that under such a system workers have little incentive to improve their skills, accomplish their work-related goals, or assume responsibility for the completion of their assigned tasks. In my experience, human motivation is such that without enticements such as money, status or recognition, few people would accomplish anything of value or assume responsibility for any task. A flat system actually might provide a distinct disincentive for productivity and efficiency insofar as workers are not held accountable for the quality or quantity of their work. By ignoring human nature, then, a company may be harming itself by encouraging laziness and complacency.
In sum, the speakers opinion that a flat organizational structure is the best way to promote collegiality and cooperation among employees runs counter to the common sense about how people act in a work environment, and in any case provides a feeble rationale for the preference of one organizational structure over another.
Magical coat
“里约+20”峰会将推进企业绿色计划
黑客公布一批苹果移动设备用户数据
美国家庭
了不起的衬衫“夫人”的美好回忆
A Father, a Son and an Answer
英语美文 I Love You, Mom
伦敦奥运香港选手韦汉娜
Lex专栏:百度与中国搜索市场
全球私人股本业规模达3万亿美元
新规则下的人力资本宣言
美国将巴格拉姆监狱移交阿富汗
My Irreplaceable Treasure 人生珍品
男人间的友谊
大陆游客为台湾经济带来活力
Lex专栏:铁矿石价格决定力拓兴衰
亡羊补牢,尤未迟也
长沙市推出1300亿美元刺激计划
新工业革命带来的机遇
苹果和三星为结案陈词做准备
谷歌拟在摩托罗拉移动裁员4000人
华尔街仍在为奥巴马提供竞选资金
Essence of happiness
当心,电子书也在“读”你
欧洲央行救得了欧元吗?
像无人观望一样纵情地起舞
企业价值观不能计算
坚持你的梦想
人生絮语:爱在心里成长
毕业典礼演讲不会告诉你的10件事
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |