GMAT考试写作参考例文
The following appeared in the editorial section of a daily newspaper.
Although forecasts of presidential elections based on opinion polls measure current voter preference, many voters keep changing their minds about whom they prefer until the last few days before the balloting. Some do not even make a final decision until they enter the voting booth. Forecasts based on opinion polls are therefore little better at predicting election outcomes than a random guess would be.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this editorial the author asserts that opinion polls are little better than random guesses to predicting outcomes of presidential elections. The authors basis for this assertion is that opinion polls measure only the preferences of voters at the time of the poll and that many voters change their preferences several time before votingsome remaining undecided until the moment they cast their vote. The authors reasoning is unconvincing in two critical respects.
First of all the predictions based on random guessing are such that the greater the number of candidates, the less likely the prediction will be correct. The reason for this is obvious: random guessing requires that no outside information be allowed to influence the guess. Predictions based on opinion polls, on the other hand, will differ considerably from those based on random guesses simply because outside information will influence the result. For example, in a four-person race, random guessing would yield the correct prediction 25 percent of the time, whereas the percentage of correct predictions based on opinion polls would be much higher. The reason for this disparity is simple. Opinion polls enable us to narrow the choices. That is, opinion polls serve to reduce the number of viable candidates in the voters mind and thereby increase the likelihood that the prediction based on them will be correct.
In addition, while it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of everyone. Moreover, people who do change their minds frequently or wait until the last moment to decide have typically narrowed their choice to a few candidates.
In conclusion, the author is mistaken in believing that random guessing would be as reliable as opinion polls in predicting the outcomes of presidential elections.
Obama's incumbency vs Romney's hurdles
School shooting suspect 'planned to kill' again
UN's Ban pushes Annan Syria plan
Yogurt and jelly makers worry about blogs' effects
Central bank gives yuan more latitude
Parents of slain Florida teen criticize info leaks
US urged to stop meddling over Tibet
British PM under pressure in selling access row
Iran mulls venues for nuclear talks
Scalded woman fighting for life
Baby declared dead found alive in coffin
High winds warning for weekend
Students caught betting on sports
Police detain 21 in alleged coal mine cover up
Coca-Cola opens biggest bottling plant in China
Japan deploys interceptors for launch
First US Marines arrive in Australia
Panic over tsunami alert
Satellite fueled up for launch
Soldiers in Mali seize power after attack on palace
China-New Zealand relationship 'best ever'
Netizens go to court over 1 yuan trips
That's no wolf, that's my Lady
Afghan Taliban say US must rebuild trust
More travelers from mainland going overseas
Obama to stress security alliance in Seoul visit
US plane makes emergency landing after pilot rant about bomb
Pandas show interest, but fail to mate at zoo
Translation errors cause disputes over contract terms
Violent end for shooter
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |