GMAT考试写作参考例文
The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.
This city should be able to improve existing services and provide new ones without periodically raising the taxes of the residents. Instead, the city should require that the costs of services be paid for by developers who seek approval for their large new building projects. After all, these projects can be highly profitable to the developers, but they can also raise a citys expenses and increase the demand for its services.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this editorial the author argues that improvements to existing city services as well as new services should be paid for by developers rather than by taxpayers. In support of this opinion the author points out that developers can make large profits from building projects and that these projects increase the demand for city services and raise the citys expenses, I disagree with the authors opinion for two reasons.
First, the fact that developers stand to make profits from their projects is not a good reason to require them to pay more than their fair share of the costs of services. In fact, to require them to do this in order to win approval of their projects is tantamount to robbery. City officials would find it difficult to justify a policy that endorsed this practice. Moreover, the adoption of such a practice would discourage the development of new buildings in the city.
Second, the increase in demand for city services as well as the increase in the citys expenses will be most likely offset by the tax revenues these projects generate. Consequently, unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, the authors concern about these issues is unfounded.
In conclusion, I find the authors reasoning on this issue unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the city would be harmed financially by approving new building projects.
体坛英语资讯:Rios Maracana stadium to host 2020 Copa Libertadores final
《一步之遥》获“脏烟灰缸奖”
无奈的“万能居委会”
有一种假期叫作“虫草假”
学会笃信生活的魔力
国际英语资讯:UKs Labour Party launches election manifesto
习近平出席俄“胜利日”阅兵式
“抗日神剧”还能有多雷
国际英语资讯:AIIB membership complements Irelands development programs: minister
“胡萝卜加大棒”战略
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier meets intl institutions leaders on world economy
政协座谈会建言“媒体融合”
东莞建第一座“无人工厂”
母女“联名发表”论文引质疑
中国的“大众富裕阶层”
庆安官场被“链式举报”
《牛津词典》公布2019年度词汇:“气候紧急状态”
“外交访问”有多少种?
体坛英语资讯:Madrid Clasico postponed due to unrest in Catalan region
体坛英语资讯:ANALYSIS: Four things to look out for in Spains matchday 9
“自贸区战略”倒逼金融改革
“导盲犬”可乘坐北京地铁
“公民网络电子身份标识”签发
深改组:“改革促进派”将获重用
中国已到“工业反哺农业”阶段
一周热词回顾
什么是“抵押补充贷款”?
京杭试水“无人超市”
体坛英语资讯:Preview: Man Utd vs Liverpool the highlight of fascinating and tense Premier League weekend
国际英语资讯:EPP congress adopts climate policies
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |