Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
国际英语资讯:IMF to provide 50-bln-USD emergency financing to help address COVID-19
有些垃圾食品可能会改变你的大脑,让你更能吃
英国科学家研发新冠病毒检测口罩
体坛英语资讯:Real Madrid sign Brazilian youngster Reinier, while Espanyol snap up defender Cabrera
体坛英语资讯:FC Kairat sign Poland midfielder Jacek Goralski
研究发现:15年内北极将迎来“无冰”夏季
体坛英语资讯:Rashford out until February due to back injury
国内英语资讯:China to optimize network services for online education amid epidemic
一网红假装在巴厘岛度假,实际居然在宜家!
体坛英语资讯:Roundup: Rain disrupts day one of Australian Open, big names progress
体坛英语资讯:Haaland in the footsteps of Aubameyang and Lewandowski
北欧一公司推出环保洗手液
国际英语资讯:Over 1,800 test positive for coronavirus in Italy as death toll reaches 52
体坛英语资讯:Chicago Fire FC sign Slovenian striker Beric from Saint-Etienne
国际英语资讯:Egyptian, U.S. presidents discuss ways to settle Nile Dam dispute
体坛英语资讯:Setien starts with win as Barca and Real Madrid pull clear in Spain
英国科学家研发新冠病毒检测口罩
国内英语资讯:Xi Focus-Timeline: Xi leads China to fight COVID-19 with sci-tech
国际英语资讯:News Analysis: Erdogan-Putin meeting expected to ease spiking tensions in Syrias Idlib: ex
The Biggest Festival 最大的节日
国际英语资讯:Argentina confirms first COVID-19 case
体坛英语资讯:Foreign coach helps develop tennis in Northwest China
一个癌症患者的愿望
国际英语资讯:Former GE chairman and CEO Jack Welch dies at 84
卢森堡成为全球首个公共交通免费国家
国内英语资讯:China mulls measures for local finances to secure basic livelihood
国内英语资讯:China to ensure steady economic, social progress through refined mechanism for stability in
《利刃出鞘》导演:电影中的坏人不能用苹果手机
体坛英语资讯:Real Madrid sleep as leaders on Saturday after beating Sevilla
国内英语资讯:Chinas Hubei to close temporary hospitals as situation improves
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |