Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯大众将在北美投资70亿
2016高考英语考纲解读及热点演练:14 情景交际
2016届河南省济源市高考英语完形填空与词汇复练(2)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯谷歌32亿欲收购nestlabs
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(8)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯联想将收购ibm低端服务器业务
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(5)
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(2)
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(6)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯阿根廷比索遭遇近十年最大跌幅
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(11)
2016高考英语考纲解读及热点演练:12 名词性从句
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(12)(含解析)
Forgiving a thief in the night
2016高考英语考纲解读及热点演练:10 状语从句
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯美国tigerdirect宣布支持比特币支付
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(1)(含解析)
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(6)(含解析)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯美国银行开始封锁俄罗斯客户
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(7)(含解析)
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(10)
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(4)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯北京写字楼市场全球排名第四
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯肯尼亚总统宣布减薪减少财政压力
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(11)(含解析)
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯盖茨:2035年世界上将几乎没有贫穷的国家
2016届高考英语阅读理解考前突破:财经资讯波多黎各向市民征求经济发展意见
2016届天津市宁河县高考英语阅读理解训练(3)(含解析)
2016届北京市东城区高考英语单项选择课外训练(12)
2016高考英语考纲解读及热点演练:11 定语从句
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |