Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
丢失钱包18年 分文未少归原主
想快乐不难 只需早上床
1000镑一周!没钱就去英国搬砖吧
研究发现:职业决定你如何谈恋爱
骚扰电话招人烦 英政府开50万英镑罚单
国内英语资讯:China, Brazil to strengthen comprehensive strategic partnership
让地球见证 男子太空求婚感动女友
如何防止机器人抢走你的饭碗
Facebook公布2017年度热门话题榜
严寒慢慢逼近 寒冬约会新技能
考试作弊要坐牢 世界9大奇葩法律
体坛英语资讯:Dortmund overpower Cologne 3-1 in German Bundesliga
国际英语资讯:UN General Assembly to spotlight climate change: Guterres
如何才能与老板相处好?
国内英语资讯:Xi stresses confidence, hard work in central China inspection
国内英语资讯:Intl fellowship program shares Chinas development with world
打底裤不算裤子 美国地方议会出女性穿衣指南
10岁慈善家 街头拉琴数月筹款3万镑
不只是玩具 乐高助残疾乌龟自由行走
爱在城南 奥巴马恋爱物语将搬荧幕
爸爸伤哪儿 细数囧爸带孩的22种伤
比尔盖茨推荐2017年5本必读好书
国际英语资讯:Sri Lankas presidential elections to be held on Nov. 16
体坛英语资讯:Olympic champion Chen Long knocked out by Antonsen in badminton worlds quarters
护肤妙招:这些常见的果蔬竟然还有亮肤功效
科学午睡的4个大招 你知道吗
现实版画皮:新型人造皮肤具有真实感知体验
我们为什么热衷于八卦
研究:夫妻年龄相近的婚姻更长久
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier meets Putin on bilateral ties
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |