Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Develop your position by giving specific reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that government must support the arts but at the same time impose no control over what art is produced. The implicit rationale for government intervention in the arts is that, without it, cultural decline and erosion of our social fabric will result. However, I find no empirical evidence to support this argument, which in any event is unconvincing in light of more persuasive arguments that government should play no part in either supporting or restricting the arts.
First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government. Although public health is generally viewed as critical to a societys very survival and therefore an appropriate concern of government, this concern should not extend tenuously to our cultural health or well-being. A lack of private funding might justify an exception: in my observation; however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.
Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions; priorities, and choices, it is unconscionable to relegate normative decisions as to which art has value to a few legislators and jurists, who may be unenlightened in their notions about art. Also, legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of those lobbyists with the most money and influence.
Third, restricting artistic expression may in some cases encroach upon the constitutional right of free expression. In any case, governmental restriction may chill creativity, thereby defeating the very purpose of subsidizing the arts.
In the final analysis, government cannot philosophically or economically justify its involvement in the arts, either by subsidy or sanction. Responsibility lies with individuals to determine what art has value and to support that art.
速来围观:世界上“最健康的汉堡”
英国研制智能衣柜 轻松淘汰闲置衣物
奥运赛况:举重乒乓再获2金
有政府背景的中国集团收购AC米兰
骄阳似火:防晒,你真的防住了吗?
奥运名将都爱拔火罐
奥运奖金哪家强?印尼是德国17倍
教你23个保证假期安全的简单方法
中国运动服装品牌掘金里约奥运会
邮储银行IPO是市场信心试金石
九种不宜放冰箱的食物
里约约不约:配对神器爆红奥运村
女人最爱的是什么?七夕礼物就送她
盘点历届奥运会乌龙事件
王宝强离婚了 看看你的恋情能否长久?
个人品牌比你想象的脆弱
美新人举行虚拟现实婚礼 随时随地重温最美时光
让你的学习更高效的方法
中国游客丢钱包 误入德国难民营
女人在一起住月经真的会同步吗
该给离岸人民币起个什么名
“洪荒少女”坦言遭遇“大姨妈”引热议
奥运赛况:中国队再获1金3银3铜
漫步奥运村:一个安静又活力四射的地球小区
女人眼里 男人穿什么鞋最有魅力
为重获品牌声望 寇驰从北美商场大规模撤出
中国新生儿基因组及胚胎基因组计划启动
加拿大广播公司为辱骂中国游泳选手道歉
里约奥运村环境太差 澳大利亚代表团拒绝入住
告诉你让你觉得数学那么难学的真正原因
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |