Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic manner depends on: the goals toward which the traits are directed, the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and the job of the individual within an organization.
A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not inconsistent per se with personal strength, energy and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving manner-for example, through pilfering or backstabbing-these traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these goals can motivate other team members, thereby advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and common purpose.
Nevertheless, overemphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy competition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.
In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement a strong team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, alt can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organizations goals.
2010年高考英语语法精讲三十:否定句
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十三:过去将来时
2010年高考英语语法精讲六:物主代词
after和behind的用法区别 相似词语辨析(7)
2010年高考英语语法精讲十五:主谓一致原则
2010年高考英语语法精讲十七:一般现在时
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十二:过去进行时
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十六:情态动词
advance和advancement 用法区别 相似词语辨析(6)
another和the other 的区别 相似词语辨析(12)
2010年高考英语语法精讲三十四:省略与替代
It's time后的从句用虚拟语气
2010年高考英语语法精讲二:数词
2010年高考英语语法精讲十三:It句型
alive和living 的区别 相似词语辨析(8)
ante-和anti的区别用法 相似词语辨析(13)
2010年高考英语语法精讲十六:时态的综合问题
amount和number的区别 相似词语辨析(11)
2010年高考英语语法精讲十:副词
2010年高考英语语法精讲一:名词
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十一:一般过去时
你离英语满分有多远?挑战你的English基础!
2010年高考英语语法精讲四:人称代词
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十九:反意疑问句
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十五:语态
2010年高考英语语法精讲十九:一般将来时
at last和at length 的区别用法 相似词语辨析(16)
2010年高考英语语法精讲三:冠词
2010年高考英语语法精讲二十七:特殊疑问句
2010年高考英语语法精讲十二:基本句型
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |