The following appeared in an article in a college departmental newsletter
Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction in which students receive ten weeks of intensive training, then go abroad to live with families for ten weeks. The superiority of the model, Professor Taylor contends, is proved by the results of a study in which foreign language tests given to students at 25 other colleges show that first-year foreign language students at Jones speak more fluently after only ten to twenty weeks in the program than do nine out of ten foreign language majors elsewhere at the time of their graduation.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This newsletter article claims that Professor Taylors foreign-language program at Jones University is a model of foreign language instruction. This conclusion is based on a study in which foreign language tests were given to students at 25 other universities. The study shows that first-year language students at Jones speak more fluently after just 10 to 20 weeks in the program than do 90 percent of foreign-language majors at other colleges at graduation. Despite these impressive statistics, I am unconvinced by this argument for two reasons.
To begin with, the assumption here is that students from Professor Taylors program have learned more than foreign language students at other universities. However, we are not given enough information about the study to be sure that this comparison is reliable. For example, the article does not tell us whether the foreign language students at Jones were given the tests; it only reports that the tests in question were given to students at 25 other colleges. If Jones students were not tested, then no basis exists for comparing them to students at the other universities. In addition, the article does not indicate whether students at all the universities, including Jones, were given the same tests. If not, then again no basis exists for the comparison.
Furthermore, we cannot tell from this article whether the universities in the study, or their students, are comparable in other ways. For instance, Jones might be a prestigious university that draws its students from the top echelon of high school graduates, while the other universities are lower-ranked schools with more lenient admission requirements. In this event, the study wouldnt tell us much about Professor Taylors program, for the proficiency of his students might be a function of their superior talent and intelligence.
In conclusion, the statistics cited in the article offer little support for the claim about Taylors program. To strengthen the argument, the author must show that the universities in the study, including Jones, were comparable in other ways, that their foreign language students were tested identically, and that Taylors program was the only important difference between students tested at Jones and those tested at the other universities.
大学生英语听说能力障碍分析
英语课堂游戏:十个问题
任务型语言教学在新目标英语教学中的应用
关于冬奥会三金王的情景会话
你不一定知道的美音英音区别
小学英语课堂游戏:听指令做动作
Let’s Smile 让我们微笑
英语听力听写训练大法
爱情名言
尴尬的摩登老妈
情系七夕系列(2)
英语游戏:报电话号码对抗赛
英语课堂游戏:问用途
Tongue Twister绕口令(中英对照)
the Darning
排队造句
看图猜人
中考英语名词专项复习
英语课堂游戏:字母书写对抗赛
谈初中英语阅读教学与创新
Christmas morning 圣诞的早晨
Hungry for your love 真爱无限
三年级英语UNIT 5教学随笔
初中英语动词的语态复习
Hello, 6-year-old child 交朋友
名人名言:人,必须相信自己
英语课堂游戏:谈家庭
波利维亚的习俗礼仪
英语教学工作总结
奥尔森姐妹:追求极致的时尚精灵
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |