The following appeared in an article in a college departmental newsletter
Professor Taylor of Jones University is promoting a model of foreign language instruction in which students receive ten weeks of intensive training, then go abroad to live with families for ten weeks. The superiority of the model, Professor Taylor contends, is proved by the results of a study in which foreign language tests given to students at 25 other colleges show that first-year foreign language students at Jones speak more fluently after only ten to twenty weeks in the program than do nine out of ten foreign language majors elsewhere at the time of their graduation.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This newsletter article claims that Professor Taylors foreign-language program at Jones University is a model of foreign language instruction. This conclusion is based on a study in which foreign language tests were given to students at 25 other universities. The study shows that first-year language students at Jones speak more fluently after just 10 to 20 weeks in the program than do 90 percent of foreign-language majors at other colleges at graduation. Despite these impressive statistics, I am unconvinced by this argument for two reasons.
To begin with, the assumption here is that students from Professor Taylors program have learned more than foreign language students at other universities. However, we are not given enough information about the study to be sure that this comparison is reliable. For example, the article does not tell us whether the foreign language students at Jones were given the tests; it only reports that the tests in question were given to students at 25 other colleges. If Jones students were not tested, then no basis exists for comparing them to students at the other universities. In addition, the article does not indicate whether students at all the universities, including Jones, were given the same tests. If not, then again no basis exists for the comparison.
Furthermore, we cannot tell from this article whether the universities in the study, or their students, are comparable in other ways. For instance, Jones might be a prestigious university that draws its students from the top echelon of high school graduates, while the other universities are lower-ranked schools with more lenient admission requirements. In this event, the study wouldnt tell us much about Professor Taylors program, for the proficiency of his students might be a function of their superior talent and intelligence.
In conclusion, the statistics cited in the article offer little support for the claim about Taylors program. To strengthen the argument, the author must show that the universities in the study, including Jones, were comparable in other ways, that their foreign language students were tested identically, and that Taylors program was the only important difference between students tested at Jones and those tested at the other universities.
政府尝试镇压的语言 新加坡式英语
5天大新生儿被当成布娃娃 遭63岁男子打脸
高考英语作文范文:保持记英语日记的好习惯
澳大利亚一巨型英国獒犬身长已超过两米
what的用法
世界上最热的地方 达纳基尔大沙漠
2016年5月21日GRE写作机经1
英国最老模特讲述美丽传奇 65岁仍然魅力四射
这么厉害!捷克男子开自制飞机上下班!
GRE写作高分的八个小技巧
印尼旅游圣地巴厘岛发生游船爆炸事件
超市排队有技巧!原来这样排队结账最快
离婚率上涨的罪魁祸首竟是高房价
男婴飞机上出生 获赠终身免费乘机
In the park.
高考英语作文范文:交朋友的准则
中秋节
The Spring Festival
高考英语作文范文:我对近视眼的看法
5个月大男婴身负狼人基因 家族遗传令母亲心碎
2016年5月21日GRE阅读机经
GRE考生的写作5.5高分经验分享
英文谚语
六一快乐
高考英语作文范文:一次成功的经历
攻克GRE阅读之经典长难句练习2
英语四级选词填空高分秘笈:如何确定词性
Friend in my heart
高考英语作文范文:谈论计划
维多利亚女王一条内裤拍出天价创纪录!
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |