The following appeared in a newspaper editorial. As violence in movies increases, so do crime rates in our cities. To combat this problem we must establish a board to censor certain movies, or we must limit admission to persons over 21 years of age. Apparently our legislators are not concerned about this issue since a bill calling for such actions recently failed to receive a majority vote. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
Based upon a correlation between increases in movie violence and crime rates in cities, the author argues that to combat crime in cities we must either censor movies that contain violence or prohibit people who are under 21 years of age from viewing them. The author further argues that because legislators failed to pass a bill calling for these alternatives, they are not concerned with the problem of crime in our cities. The authors reasoning is unconvincing, since it suffers from two critical problems.
To begin with, the authors solution to the problem rests on the claim that portrayals of violence in movies are the cause of crime in the cities. However, the evidence offered is insufficient to support this claim. A mere positive correlation between movie violence and city crime rates does not necessarily prove a causal relationship. In addition, all other prospective causes of city crime such as poverty or unemployment must be ruled out. As it stands, the authors solution to the problem is based upon an oversimplified analysis of the issue.
Another problem with the argument is that the authors solution assumes that only persons under 21 years of age are adversely affected by movie violence. Ultimately, this means that the author is committed to the view that, for the most part, the perpetrators of crime in cities are juveniles under 21. Lacking evidence to support this view, the authors solution cannot be taken seriously.
In conclusion, the best explanation of the failure of the bill calling for the actions proposed in this argument is that most legislators were capable of recognizing the simplistic analysis of the problem upon which these actions are based. Rather than providing a demonstration of a lack of concern about this issue, the legislators votes reveal an understanding of the complexities of this problem and an unwillingness to accept simple solutions.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
十四招轻松拿雅思阅读7分
雅思听力表格填空题难易程度弹性比较大
三考雅心得雅思只是学英语的起点
教给你提高雅思考试听说能力理性捷径
什么是IELTS雅思含义探秘及启示
雅思作文考前必看谨防混题
全球雅思成绩公布中国考生成绩逆势微涨
高三学生雅思7.5分我是幸运的也是努力的
名师酷评雅思考试第一季度口试
对于雅思写作准备工作的五点建议
背景知识在提高雅思听力考试中重要性
高效积累雅思词汇秘籍找最实用单词是关键
名师指点雅思口语考试隐形评分标准
雅思考试命题范围将出现变化
雅思考官青睐的背景句写作分享使用句型
留学美国究竟是该考雅思还是托福
雅思听力拿满分成都女生细说高分诀窍
权威分析雅思口语评分新标准应对策略
雅思阅读出题思路有意测试学生快速阅读能力
雅思听力技巧
完整又诚恳的雅思考试经验全攻略
雅思口语于8月增加5种分值评分细化
雅思潜规则考官反应推理口语分数
雅思听力拦路虎七大策略攻克难关
国内首份北京雅思培训调研报告出炉
中国雅思考生破历史纪录
雅思听力考试解题黄金思路
雅思听力考试之难度和策略大揭秘
全球雅思120万考生未来有望引入机考
七招搞定雅思阅读拦路虎生词
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |