The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine on lifestyles. Two years ago, City L was listed 14th in an annual survey that ranks cities according to the quality of life that can be enjoyed by those living in them. This information will enable people who are moving to the state in which City L is located to confidently identify one place, at least, where schools are good, housing is affordable, people are friendly, the environment is safe, and the arts flourish. Discuss how well reasoned.。. etc.
The author concludes that City L has good schools, affordable housing, friendly people, flourishing arts and a safe environment. To support this claim the author cites an annual survey that ranks cities according to quality of life. Two years ago City L was listed 14th in this survey. As it stands this argument is unconvincing.
First, the author fails to indicate what individual characteristics of cities were used as criteria for the ranking. To the extent that the criteria used in the survey were the same as the features listed by the author in the conclusion, the conclusion would be warranted. On the other hand, if the survey employed entirely different criteriafor example, outdoor recreational opportunities or educational achievement levels of adult residentsthen the authors conclusion would be wholly unwarranted.
Secondly, the author provides no indication of how each characteristic was weighted in the ranking. For example, City L may have far and away the most flourishing arts scene among the cities surveyed, but it may have poor schools, unfriendly people, and an unsafe environment. The extent to which the survey accurately reflects City Ls overall quality of life in this case would depend largely on the relative weight placed on the arts as a factor affecting quality of life.
Thirdly, the author fails to indicate how many cities were included in the survey. Th more cities included in the survey, the stronger the argumentand vice versa. For example, if 2,000 cities were surveyed, then City L would rank in the top one percent in terms of quality of life. On the other hand, if only 14 cities were surveyed then City L would rank last.
Finally, the authors conclusion depends on the questionable assumption that the conditions listed by the author have remained unchanged in City L since the survey was conducted two years ago. Admittedly, had ten years elapsed the argument would be even weaker. Yet two years is sufficient time for a significant change in the overall economy, the citys fiscal policies, its financial condition, or its political climate. Any of these factors can affect the quality of schools, the extent to which art is flourishing, or the cost of housing.
In conclusion, the author does not adequately support the conclusion. To strengthen the argument, the author must show that the criteria used in the survey were the same as the features listed in the conclusion and were weighted in a way that does not distort the picture in City L. To better assess the argument, we would also need more information about the cities included in the survey, as well as what changes in City L have occurred during the past two years.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
节日英语:元宵节的由来
爆笑情人节:各年龄段的征婚要求(双语)
Facebook上市:扎克伯格的公开信(双语)
双语:情人节表白秘籍 教你写封甜蜜情书
对话超模 探寻骨瘦如柴的秘密(双语)
瓦尔都窗前的一瞥
伊索寓言之受伤的狼和精明的羊
约翰尼-德普被曝与女友争吵不断 恋情告急
盘点2011-《时代》十大消费电子设备
盘点2011年国内外焦点事件(上)(中英文)
掩耳盗铃
最新研究:散播流言也有好处?!(双语)
怎样轻松摆脱“节后忧虑症”(双语)
贵阳最美女孩:90后少女寒夜跳河救人
上帝之国 Kingdom of God
细数接吻的六大功效:今天你亲吻了吗?
伊索寓言7
漫画图说:我的新年计划(双语)
口渴的乌鸦
披着狮皮的驴The ass in the lions skin
三只小猪和大灰狼
有关清明节的英语作文
“情人节”礼物——播种爱情
最新研究:红衣男人对女人更具吸引力?
嫁妆给多少? 游戏“愤怒的新娘”走红网络
清明节扫墓英语作文
海尔柯贝斯2
吃3个菜要4000元 春节游客三亚被宰
节日英语:元宵节的各种习俗
热门事件学英语:关于校车安全的英语表达
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |