为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
109. All personnel evaluations at a company should be multi-directional that is, people at every level of the organization should review not only those working under them but also those working over them.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker asserts that employees at all levels in an organization should review one another, including those working over them as well as under them. I agree in part. Often companies will conduct two different kinds of periodic review, one to justify decisions regarding promotion and pay, and another to increase overall efficiency by assessing employee performance. Multi-directional evaluation should never be part of the first kind of review; however, it can be valuable in the second kind and, therefore, should be used there.
On the one hand, lower-level employees have too much organizational power if their evaluations are used in decisions about the pay or promotions of their superiors. Employees can intimidate superiors with the threat of bad review. Also employees can use the review process to retaliate against those at higher levels. In either case, the authority of a manager or an executive can be seriously compromised, and productivity is lost in the process.
On the other hand, the most revealing criticisms of a superiors style often come from those subject to it. In a process of review that isnt connected to promotion or pay, employees at all levels can be more comfortable and forthright about sharing concerns. In turn, every employee is more likely to get accurate feedback, including constructive criticism, that will help each nurture strengths and improve areas of weakness. In this way , multi-directional evaluation can greatly enhance organizational efficiency.
Furthermore, multi-directional evaluation in this context helps prevent worker alienation and subsequent lowered productivity. Widening the performance review process will very likely foster a greater sense of personal involvement in ones work, especially among lower-level employees. Recent studies have shown that people who feel more invested in their jobs tend to work more cooperatively and productively.
In conclusion, there is an important role for multi-directional personnel evaluation in the workplace. While it should be clearly separate from issues of promotion and pay, as part of the performance review process it can encourage better employee relations and higher productivity.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
雅思分类词汇整理:教育(5)
雅思分类词汇整理:骨科(1)
雅思分类词汇整理:国际组织
雅思分类词汇整理:化妆品品牌
雅思分类词汇整理:海啸
雅思分类词汇整理:国家名称
雅思分类词汇整理:标点符号
雅思分类词汇整理:教育(8)
雅思分类词汇整理:高频同义词(1)
雅思分类词汇整理:数码相机规格
雅思分类词汇整理:教育(2)
雅思分类词汇整理:中国人民团体名称
雅思分类词汇整理:旅行签证
雅思分类词汇整理:河流(4)
雅思分类词汇整理:个人简历词汇
雅思分类词汇整理:联合国(4)
雅思分类词汇整理:船舶(4)
雅思分类词汇整理:联合国(2)
雅思分类词汇整理:中国国家机关名称
雅思分类词汇整理:艺术(3)
雅思分类词汇整理:职业名称
雅思分类词汇整理:个人品质(5)
雅思分类词汇整理:形近义远词汇辨析(2)
雅思备考:万能句子和同义词的使用
雅思分类词汇整理:艺术(2)
雅思分类词汇整理:个人品质(1)
雅思分类词汇整理:河流(1)
雅思分类词汇整理:钱币
雅思分类词汇整理:手机通讯
雅思分类词汇整理:船舶(2)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |