为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
109. All personnel evaluations at a company should be multi-directional that is, people at every level of the organization should review not only those working under them but also those working over them.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker asserts that employees at all levels in an organization should review one another, including those working over them as well as under them. I agree in part. Often companies will conduct two different kinds of periodic review, one to justify decisions regarding promotion and pay, and another to increase overall efficiency by assessing employee performance. Multi-directional evaluation should never be part of the first kind of review; however, it can be valuable in the second kind and, therefore, should be used there.
On the one hand, lower-level employees have too much organizational power if their evaluations are used in decisions about the pay or promotions of their superiors. Employees can intimidate superiors with the threat of bad review. Also employees can use the review process to retaliate against those at higher levels. In either case, the authority of a manager or an executive can be seriously compromised, and productivity is lost in the process.
On the other hand, the most revealing criticisms of a superiors style often come from those subject to it. In a process of review that isnt connected to promotion or pay, employees at all levels can be more comfortable and forthright about sharing concerns. In turn, every employee is more likely to get accurate feedback, including constructive criticism, that will help each nurture strengths and improve areas of weakness. In this way , multi-directional evaluation can greatly enhance organizational efficiency.
Furthermore, multi-directional evaluation in this context helps prevent worker alienation and subsequent lowered productivity. Widening the performance review process will very likely foster a greater sense of personal involvement in ones work, especially among lower-level employees. Recent studies have shown that people who feel more invested in their jobs tend to work more cooperatively and productively.
In conclusion, there is an important role for multi-directional personnel evaluation in the workplace. While it should be clearly separate from issues of promotion and pay, as part of the performance review process it can encourage better employee relations and higher productivity.
小编提醒:考生们可在日常生活中多读范文,多练笔,培养出好的语感和逻辑,这样才能在考试中写出优秀的作文。
青蛙的儿歌
我的国庆节
扇
看猴子
快乐的暑假
为什么“师范大学”译成normal,清华大学是Tsinghua?高校英文译名套路真多!
每日一词∣北斗卫星导航系统 the Beidou Navigation Satellite System
春
哈佛大学和麻省理工学院起诉美国政府 反对留学生签证新规
每日一词∣中医医术确有专长人员 TCM specialists
巴黎圣母院塔尖将按原样重建
在咖啡厅要“续杯”你居然说成one more?
群体免疫真的靠谱吗?西班牙新研究提出质疑
独木桥上
喂鱼
公园里的菊花
无题
美丽的秋天
这就是我
逃生训练
难得的夏雨
特朗普终于在公开场合戴口罩了!
老虎的苦恼
美国又“退群” 宣布退出世界卫生组织
王毅在中美智库媒体论坛上的致辞(双语全文)
每日一词∣中国-阿拉伯国家合作论坛 China
公园里的菊花
丁丁是负责任的值日生
千万别把“发票”翻译成invoice!否则误会大了...
世界卫生组织:不排除新冠病毒可以通过空气传播
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |