雅思范文应先支边还是自由工作

　　Essay Question 10/15In many countries, good schools andmedicalfacilities are available only in cities. Some people thinknewteachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a fewyears.But some others think everyone should be free to choose wheretheywork .Discuss and give your own opinion. 　　GZ明摆着没招儿了，老题出两三道之后怕咱们发现规律（其实规律明摆着在那儿）就又赶紧编一两道新题给咱做。这不就是城乡差异加教师和护士的待遇两道题合一块么！今年所谓的新题没有一道不是这么改装出来的，IELTS作文出题在话题方面明显已经遇到了困境。TOEFL的写作出题者就聪明，预感到总有一天作文话题是会出尽的，所以就把所有的题放在网上每次从里面挑题考，这样考官虽然刚开始累一点，但是不用永远不停的逼着自己想新话题，哪有那么多完全不同的可以当作考题的话题可出呀？让你用中文一直出有写作考试价值的作文题你出得了么？很多同学以为剑4的作文题都是新编的，怎么会！绝大多数都是以前考过的老作文题甚至G类作文题（比如studentsbehavior,比如freedom ofcreativeartists)再拿来编一本新书！可以肯定，IELTS作文总有一天要走上固定题库（但是不一定会公布在网上，而且也有可能把老题微调一下就非说成是新题，英国人做事和老美不一样,这就要求咱们对文章结构要有调整的能力）的道路，否则考官活得太累了（从今年全球几个大考区的题目，剑4www.ielts.org上面发布消息用的一些范文可以看出他们现在已经明显感到了作文考试不固定题库这种很有个性的做法有多么累。去年中国区的负责人跟咱们大陆考生信誓旦旦的说作文题再也不会重复考了，每道题都是不重样儿的，今年还不是满眼的老题么！英国人做事就这种风格）具体看10/15这道题，当然是想素材四种方法当中的综合法得出观点：去农村有好处但是要自愿。那么就四段，还是老一套，开头段3+1或者再加一句4+1，主体段1讲不太倾向的观点1+4，主体段第二段更倾向的观点1+6，结尾段3句。词汇90%以上用36天背单词里面的词就搞定了，30个加分句型和通用，专用模板背熟，10/15这篇里我没有用那十句名人讲IELTS。9月17号之后大陆没有考试，另外几个考区都是老题，所以一直没写新的范文。这两天刚旅行结束回北京还有点累，所以这篇范文没太努力给大伙儿写，17，8分钟随手写完了交差：） 　　In this day and age, it can be generally observed that thedisparitybetween cities and the country has been aggravated by relentle ssurbanization. With respect to educational and medicalfacilities, ayawning gap has emerged between those in cities andthe rural ones. 　　This manifest chasm has prompted some to suggestthat teachers anddoctors fresh out of university work in thecountry for a fewyears.Yet many are opposed to this view on thegrounds that itinfringes upon individual freedom to choose wheretheywork.Personally, I think both these two views have meritanddemerit.Granted,assigning new teachers and doctors tothecountryside may create certain benefits.To begin with,thispracticecan help foster a strong sense of obligation in manyteachers anddoctors.They can experience first-hand how therural residentsare held back by the out-moded teaching and medicalfacilities andthis, in turn, can inspire a host of professionals tocommitthemselves to the alleviation of this disturbingsituation.Moreover,the inferior living and working conditions inthe countrycan temper many of these young professionals soul.Theyare verylikely to be more tenacious and determined and hencemoresuccessful than their urban counterparts inlatercareers.However,there are even more drawbacks that thispracticecan engender.In the first place,many young teachers anddoctorswill feel unmotivated or frustrated if they are sent torural areasagainst their own will.They may have a hard time gettingaccustomedto the shabby housing and primitive facilities and slackoff atwork. 　　?In the second place,if new teachers and doctors arecoerced towork in the countryside, a considerable proportion ofthem may findit daunting when it comes time for them to relocate tocities aftera few years in the country.They will feel intenseoccupationalstress when they cannot operate efficiently equipmentmuch moreadvanced than the devices they are used to back in thecountryschool or hospital. Last but not least, given theinferiority ofthe rural educational and medical facilities,it ishighly probablethat the inexperience of new teachers and doctorswill lead tounsatisfactory job performance in rural schools andclinics.Wereally cannot expect fresh recruits to work wonders withoutdatedtools.In the final analysis,I concede that sending teachersanddoctors fresh out of college to the countryside mayproducespecific advantages. However,if we enforcethisindiscriminately,that will surely generate even more banes.Onbalance, I am convinced that we should optimize our workforceandhonor the individual freedom in determining wheretheywork.