The Australian political scene is dominated by two major parties that have quite different political agendas. However, the policies of the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party have become much more difficult to tell apart in recent years. In fact, it would be true to say that both parties consist of conservative, moderate and radical elements, and therefore the general public is often perplexed about which party to vote for. Nonetheless, it is usual to find that an Australian will lean towards supporting one of these two parties and remain faithful to that party for life.
The Labor Party was formed early in the twentieth century to safeguard the interests of the common working man and to give the trade unions political representation in Parliament. The Party has always had strong connections with the unions, and supports the concept of a welfare society in which people who are less fortunate than others are financially, and otherwise, assisted in their quest for a more equitable slice of the economic pie. The problem is that such socialist political agendas are extremely expensive to implement and maintain, especially in a country that, although comparatively wealthy, is vast and with a small working and hence taxpaying population base. Welfare societies tend towards bankruptcy unless government spending is kept in check. The Liberal Party, on the other hand, argues that the best way to ensure afair division of wealth in the country is to allow more freedom to create it.This, in turn, means more opportunities, jobs created etc., and therefore more wealth available to all. Just how the poor are to share in the distribution of this wealth is, however, less well understood. Practice, of course, may make nonsense of even the best theoretical intentions, and often the less politically powerful are badly catered for under governments implementing free-for-all policies.
It is no wonder that given the two major choices offered them, Australian voters are increasingly turning their attention to the smaller political parties, which claim to offer a more balanced swag of policies, often based around one major current issue. Thus, for instance, at the last election there was the No Aircraft Noise Parry, popular in city areas, and the Green Party, which is almost solely concerned with environmental issues.
TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN
1.Policies is support of the concept of a welfare society are costly.
2.Australians usually vote for the party they supported early in life.
3.The Labor Party was formed by the trade unions.
4.Radical groups are only found within the Labor Party.
5.The Liberal Party was formed after the Labor Party.
6.Welfare-based societies invariably become bankrupt.
7.According to the author, theories do not always work in practice.
8.Some Australian voters are confused about who to vote for.
9.The No-Aircraft-Noise Party is only popular in the city.
10.The smaller parties are only concerned about the environment.
Answer Keys
1.T 2.NG 3.NG 4.F 5.NG 6.F 7.T 8.T 9.NG 10.F
荷兰开设离婚旅馆 一个周末即可迅速离婚
Facebook式离婚:丈夫未修改单身状态 妻子要求离婚
猫之恋 The Cat Thing
英国小学生自创钢笔礼服挑战Gaga
自我保护之冻结的一瞬间
40岁以后生育的小孩身体更棒 智商更高
世界最强计算机病毒被发现
伦敦出售眼泪制造的盐
脸谱破发,扎克伯格结婚三天损失百亿
科学研究之仿生眼
英女王60年登基庆典 小学生或掌勺盛宴
美私企成功发射首个商业飞船
14岁男孩成乐队指挥
你不想看广告?难!
美国联邦调查局外语人才招聘 会讲中文应聘者抢手
小萨的故事:流浪狗奔跑千里到拉萨
英国将打造两层楼高蛋糕 庆女王登基60周年
饮用咖啡有助延年益寿
学习外语好处多:双语让你更敏锐
难忘的太妃糖圣诞节
哈利波特热潮散去 大批宠物猫头鹰遭弃养
剑桥女生评选“年度美臀”惹争议
当运动减肥遇上关节担忧
贝克汉姆举家出席体育盛典:一家子好基因
印度女星被批有辱国家形象 只因产后身材发胖!
校园情侣再续前缘:再过六十年 我们来相会
美国审查孔子学院 要求部分学院教师离境
芭蕾,你是舞之女王
父亲节:世界上第一个爱你的男人
扎克伯格夫妇罗马蜜月遭吐槽 午饭32欧元没给小费
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |