Seeking an energy holy trinity
Jan 10th 2007
From Economist.com
1 NEELIE KROES, the European Unions competition commissioner, did not mince her words when reporting on Europes energy markets on Wednesday January 10th. Europes energy firms have failed to invest in networks and so customers are suffering. Those vertically integrated energy companies such as Electricit de France or Germanys E.ON, widely dubbed as national champions, are effectively behaving like local monopolies. Shy of competition, eager for artificially high prices, they are helping to block the efficient generation, transmission and distribution of energy on the continent.
2 Energy prices vary wildly across Europe. Ms Kroes wants to see cheaper energy, and intends to push suppliers to divest their distribution network and to get them to invest more in transportation systems so that more energyin the form of gas, or electricity, for examplecan flow easily over borders. It is remarkably hard, for example, for gas-poor Germany to import from the neighbouring, gas-rich Netherlands. Companies that dominate national markets have, so far, had little interest in improving the interconnections which would mean lower prices for consumers across the continent.
3 Ms Kroes, of course, will struggle to get her way. The European Commission, which on the same day presented its recommendation for improving EU energy policy, also wants to see the unbundling of ownership, the legal separation of energy suppliers and transporters, something that the integrated energy companies and interested governments, notably in France and Germany, are bound to oppose ferociously.
4 Complicating the matter is an argument over the security of energy supply in Europe. Much has been made of the risk for western Europe of depending too heavily on Russian exports of gas. Russia under Vladimir Putin is prone to using energy exports as a blunt tool of foreign policy, especially when trying to bully countries in its hinterland. Last year Russia interrupted gas deliveries to Ukraine, affecting supplies in central and western Europe too. This week it blocked oil exports passing via Belarus to Europe, though that spat was soon resolved.
5 The risk is that concerns about security of supply may be used spuriously by those in Europe who oppose the sort of liberalisation encouraged by Ms Kroes. The likes of E.ON and EDF may claim that only protected national champions are able to secure supply, by striking long-term deals with powerful foreign suppliers. The Commission disagrees. Such deals are too often politically motivated and far from transparent. Protection has been tried for long enough and evidently has not worked for the internal market, nor have these companies secured the best deals for consumers from the Russians.
6 In contrast, the Commissions new policy proposes, ideally, a break-up of these companies into suppliers and distributors. Properly independent managers of Europes energy networks would have a strong incentive to build interconnecting pipelines and power lines across borders. For the gas market another means of ensuring competition and security would be finding a more diverse range of suppliers, for example by building more terminals for the import of liquified natural gas. It would also be likely to mean lower prices, if the example of liberalised Britain over the past ten years is anything to go by.
7 Whether any of this is likely to happen soon, however, is another matter. The Commission is also calling for European governments to agree on a common effort to reduce carbon emissions by at least 20% by 2020 . If America is willing to play ball, the Commission proposes to reduce emissions by as much as 30%. Achieving either target would mean promoting cleaner cars, a more effective emissions-trading system for Europe, wider use of public transport and a sharp increase in the use of renewable sources of energy, like wind and solar power. All that is laudable enough, but will also require political horse-trading as governmentsEuropes leaders are due to meet in March to discuss the various energy proposalstry to avoid commitments that may hurt domestic energy companies or make European firms less competitive than rivals in America, Asia and elsewhere.
Questions 1-5
Do the following statements reflect the views of the writer in the reading passage?
In boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet write
YES if the statement reflects the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if there is no information about this in the passage
1.Europes energy companies have funded the construction of the distribution network.
2.There has been a wide range of energy prices within Europe.
3.Gas-poor Germany has to pay a price higher than average to import gas from its neighbour.
4.E.ON and EDF may oppose the liberalisation due to their concerns about the security of energy supply.
5.The European Commission proposes to reduce carbon emissions by 30% if the U.S. is willing to cut its.
Questions 6-10
Look at the box of countries below.
Choose One or Two countries to complete the following sentences.
Write your answers in boxes 6-10 on your answer sheet.
Countries
A. Belarus
B. Britain
C. France
D. Germany
E. Russia
F. Ukraine
G. The U.S.
6. Its dangerous for western Europe to depend too much on gas imports from
7. A liberalised policy of energy supply was enforced over ten years in
8. Last year energy supplies in central and western Europe was affected owing to the interruption of gas deliveries to
9. The governments in are bound to oppose the separation of energy suppliers and transporters?
10. Oil exports passing via to Europe was blocked this week.
Questions 11-14
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the reading passage above for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 11-14.
11. The EC disagrees with energy firms to strike long-term deals with foreign suppliers because such deals are usually far from
12. The EC proposes to split those national champions into
13. A more diverse range of suppliers would guarantee in the European gas market.
14. The realization of carbon emissions reduction would require the promotion of cleaner cars,a better emissions-trading system,wider use of public transport and more use of of energy.
Key and Explanations:
1. No
See para.1: Europes energy firms have failed to invest in networks
2. Yes
See para.2: Energy prices vary wildly across Europe.
3. Not Given
See para.2: It is remarkably hard,for example,for gas-poor Germany to import from the neighbouring,gas-rich Netherlands.
4. No
See para.5: The risk is that concerns about security of supply may be used spuriously by those in Europe who oppose the sort of liberalisation encouraged by Ms Kroes. The likes of E.ON and EDF may claim that
5. Yes
See para.7: If America is willing to play ball,the Commission proposes to reduce emissions by as much as 30%.
6. E
See para.4: Much has been made of the risk for western Europe of depending too heavily on Russian exports of gas.
7. B
See para.6: It would also be likely to mean lower prices,if the example of liberalised Britain over the past ten years is anything to go by.
8. F
See para.4: Last year Russia interrupted gas deliveries to Ukraine,affecting supplies in central and western Europe too.
9. C,D
See para.3: the legal separation of energy suppliers and transporters,something that the integrated energy companies and interested governments,notably in France and Germany,are bound to oppose ferociously.
10. A
See para.4: This week it blocked oil exports passing via Belarus to Europe,though that spat was soon resolved.
11. transparent
See para.5: by striking long-term deals with powerful foreign suppliers. The Commission disagrees. Such deals are too often politically motivated and far from transparent.
12. suppliers and distributors
See the sentences in para.1 or Germanys E.ON,widely dubbed as national champions) and para.6
13. competition and security
See para.6: For the gas market another means of ensuring competition and security would be finding a more diverse range of suppliers
14. renewable sources
See para.7: Achieving either target would mean promoting cleaner cars,a more effective emissions-trading system for Europe,wider use of public transport and a sharp increase in the use of renewable sources of energy
名师指导雅思口语八大“魔鬼话题”之媒体
名师点拨雅思习作修改、评分建议及改进策略
不可不知:雅思阅读必杀技
指导2010年雅思考试阅读趋势展望
名师雅思阅读之词汇考点分析
名师点睛雅思《剑五》写作概览
利用黄金暑假 突破雅思六分
名师解析雅思听力考试关键点审题
名师指导从听说读写中解读雅思口语
寻找突破雅思听力高效策略
名师剖析2010年5月雅思口语考试趋势
提高雅思写作能力有效途径之研习范文
名师指导雅思考试阅读题型解析
雅思考生必读想拿高分必备的四种能力
不可不知关于雅思词汇五大误解
纯英文外教谈雅思作文如何获得高分
2010年4月15日雅思口语的真题点评
考生必备雅思听力考试五大误解
名师论道:神奇组合记忆雅思考试词汇
名师指导高分口语的四大法宝
名师点评:2010年5月30日雅思口语考试真题
稳扎稳打提高雅思听力成绩四步走
观点论《论语》与雅思学习
2010年雅思口语考试PART3趋势的分析
名师指导关于雅思口语五大误解
不可不知雅思口语考试的“真功夫”
雅思名师解析口语那些事儿
真实体验“雅思之路”的四大特点
名师指导雅思阅读的五个误解
名师精析雅思阅读的基本功
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |