记一次辩论会

星期四的第三节课，我们班举行了一场对于“开卷有益”和“开卷未必有益”展开了辩论。

In the third class on Thursday, our class held a debate on "opening is beneficial" and "opening is not necessarily beneficial".

从局势上来讲，我们正方的人数是反方的六倍，但谁输谁赢就未必了。辩论会正式开始。双方先表明了各自的观点。正方主辩论手说：“我方认为“开卷有益”。高尔基曾经说过：‘书籍是人类进步的阶梯。’在这个信息化的世界里，如果缺少了知识也就像饿肚子，多读书可以修身养性，提高写作水平。所以“开卷有益”。反方主辩手听了，迫不及待的发言：“我方认为“开卷未必有益”。因为现在有些同学爱看武侠小说、武打小说、言情小说，都看入迷了，上课也看，走路也看，还模仿书中的情景。所以看书也要看好书，那些乱七八糟的书不能看。”正方的人又急了：“虽然乱七八糟的书没有什么太大的好处，但你总可以学到一点字啊，词啊，每一本书都有它的优点，就算是武打小说也会知道一点历史故事。”“而且，如果是看乱七八糟书的人，他肯定是一个心术不正的人，如果看书的人心态好的话就不会去看那些书，所以看书的人是抱着怎样的心态去看书是很重要的。”正方又一个人反驳道。反方不服，又辩解：“比如说我们班的苏颖和林巧媛，看言情小说入迷了，排路队也看。”我想：糟了，正方被抓住把柄了。林巧媛和苏颖可不服气了，就因为这个，双方辩论的更激烈了，你一言我一语，各各都像斗红了眼的小公鸡不分高低，相互搏斗。

In terms of the situation, we have six times as many people on the right side as on the other side, but whoever loses may not win. The debate officially began. The two sides first expressed their views. "We think it's beneficial to open the book," said the main debater. Gorky once said: "books are the ladder of human progress." In this information-based world, if you lack knowledge, you will feel hungry. Reading more books can cultivate your health and improve your writing level. So it's good to open a book. The opponent's main debater listened and couldn't wait to say: "we don't think it's beneficial to open the volume.". Because now some students like to read martial arts novels, martial arts novels and romance novels. They are fascinated by them. They also read them in class, walking and imitating the scenes in the books. Therefore, we should read good books as well. We can't read those messy books. " People in the right direction are worried again: "although there is no great advantage in a messy book, you can always learn a little bit of characters, words, and every book has its advantages. Even martial arts novels will know some historical stories." "What's more, if it's a person who reads a mess of books, he must be a person with a bad mind. If the person who reads a book has a good mind, he won't read those books, so it's very important for the person who reads a book to read a book with what kind of mind." Another person on the right side retorted. For example, Su Ying and Lin Qiaoyuan in our class are fascinated by romance novels, and they also read the platoon I think: No, the right side has been caught. Lin Qiaoyuan and Su Ying are not convinced. Because of this, the debate between the two sides is more intense. When you say a word and I say a word, they are all like little cockerels fighting with red eyes.

半小时后，辩论会结束了。老师引导我们开始总结：我们双方都认为有一点是相同的，要读书，就要读好书。所以，此次辩论会正反双方打成了平局！

Half an hour later, the debate was over. The teacher led us to conclude: we both agree that one thing is the same. To read, we need to read good books. Therefore, the positive and negative sides of this debate have reached a draw!

三组打一组，竟然打了个平局。正方的可不高兴了，反方又骄傲了，下课时，正反两方又开始了“辩论”。“唉！”

Three groups play one group, even a draw. The positive side is not happy, and the negative side is proud again. At the end of the class, the positive and the negative sides start to debate again. "Alas!"