The U.S. government threatened Yahoo with daily fines of $250,000 for refusing to hand over user data as part of the National Security Agency's surveillance programs, Yahoo said Thursday. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review released more than 1,500 pages of previously secret documents related to Yahoo's 2007 challenge to the government's demand for data, the company's general counsel Ron Bell said on Yahoo's Tumblr page. No documents were available immediately, but Yahoo is in the process of making them all public, he said.
雅虎周四称,美国政府威胁将以拒绝向国家安全局监视项目提交用户信息为由对公司进行每日25万美金的罚款。在雅虎的轻博客上,公司法律总顾问隆恩·贝尔称,外国情报监察法庭发布了关于2007年雅虎拒绝向政府提交数据的长达1500页的秘密文件。目前文件还无法获得,但雅虎正致力于将其完全公开。
Back in 2007, after the government "amended a key law to demand user information from online services ... we refused to comply with what we viewed as unconstitutional and overbroad surveillance and challenged the U.S. government's authority," Bell said. But the rulings against Yahoo bolstered the government's argument that national security concerns legally justified the collection of user data from tech firms.
2007年,在政府“修正法律,以要求网络线上服务商提供用户信息之后,我们拒绝配合,因雅虎认为这种行为不但违反宪法,而且是过度监视的体现,从而挑战了政府权威。”贝尔如是说。但是雅虎的反对者认为政府向技术类公司收集用户数据是处于国家安全考虑,应予以支持。
News broke last June about the National Security Agency and the FBI siphoning of personal data from the main computer servers of nine major U.S. Internet firms including Facebook, Google and Microsoft, as reported by The Post and the London-based Guardian, with documents provided by Edward Snowden. Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft did not have immediate comment.
根据邮报和伦敦卫报去年六月的资讯曝光,爱德华·斯诺登提供的文件表明国家安全局和联邦调查局向包括Facebook,谷歌及微软在内的9家美国主要互联网公司提出了上交用户数据的要求。苹果公司、Facebook、谷歌和微软均未给出立即的回应。
Portions of some released documents remain classified and Yahoo is pressing the court to agree to make those public, as well as other documents that are still classified. "We treat public safety with the utmost seriousness, but we are also committed to protecting users' data," Bell said. "We will continue to contest requests and laws that we consider unlawful, unclear, or overbroad."
部分文件仍处于机密状态,雅虎正在向法庭施压,要求公开所有文件。“我们将保护公众信息安全视为己任,但是我们更要致力于保护用户信息。”贝尔说道,“我们将会继续为所有我们认为不合法、不清晰以及过度宽泛的法规提出质疑。”
两道极易混淆的有代表性的NOT GIVEN题目
雅思学术类阅读总结
听力00082考题回忆(3月22日广州G类)
雅思阅读段落配对题答疑
轻松拿到雅思阅读高分的技巧
王晓春:3月29日A类阅读题型简评
阅读真题A类V63(2003新题)
杨俊玲:雅思阅读NOT GIVEN的八大考点
用西方思维应对雅思阅读考试
“剑六”阅读透视及最新阅读出题趋势
培养雅思阅读考试的阅读习惯
名师点拨雅思阅读易混淆词汇
阅读理解模拟试题:音乐
阅读题型做题技巧-摘要填空
如何攻克雅思阅读词汇
雅思阅读难句分析:分割结构
雅思阅读首要要素是时间
长难句结构分析最新经典一百句(上)
专家谈阅读题型List of Heading
剑桥雅思阅读译文:电木(BAKELITE)
阅读真题V54
如何读懂雅思文章(三)
陈豪:雅思文章结构阅读法
乐静:雅思学术类阅读总结
吃定单词和啃透长句
雅思阅读必须要掌握的几个技巧
雅思阅读中语法词的处理
八种类型阅读题应答全攻略(1)
李传伟解码TRUE/FALSE/NOT GIVEN题目
听力7.5分阅读8分考生心得(下)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |