A reader in Florida, apparentlybruised(擦伤)by some personal experience, writes in to complain, "If I steal a nickel's worth of merchandise, I am a thief and punished; but if I steal the love of another's wife, I am free."
This is a prevalentmisconception(误解,错觉)in many people's minds---that love, like merchandise, can be "stolen". Numerous states, in fact, have enacted laws allowing damages for "alienation of affections".
But love is not a commodity; the real thing cannot be bought, sold, traded or stolen. It is an act of the will, a turning of the emotions, a change in the climate of the personality.
When a husband or wife is "stolen" by another person, that husband or wife was already ripe for the stealing, was already predisposed toward a new partner. The "lovebandit(强盗,土匪)" was only taking what was waiting to be taken, what wanted to be taken.
We tend to treat persons like goods. We even speak of the children "belonging" to their parents. But nobody "belongs" to anyone else. Each person belongs to himself, and to God. Children are entrusted to their parents, and if their parents do not treat them properly, the state has a right to remove them from their parents' trusteeship.
Most of us, when young, had the experience of a sweetheart being taken from us by somebody more attractive and more appealing. At the time, we may have resented this intruder---but as we grew older, we recognized that the sweetheart had never been ours to begin with. It was not the intruder that "caused" the break, but the lack of a real relationship.
On the surface, many marriages seem to break up because of a "third party". This is, however, a psychological illusion. The other woman or the other man merely serves as a pretext for dissolving or a marriage that had already lost its essential integrity.
Nothing is more futile and more self-defeating than the bitterness of spurned love, the vengeful feeling that someone else has "come between" oneself and a beloved. This is always a distortion of reality, for people are not the captives or victims of others---they are free agents, working out their own destinies for good or for ill.
But the rejected lover or mate cannot afford to believe that his beloved has freely turned away from him--- and so he ascribes sinister or magical properties to the interloper. He calls him a hypnotist or a thief or a home-breaker. In the vast majority of cases, however, when a home is broken, the breaking has begun long before any "third party" has appeared on the scene.
体坛英语资讯:Bayern, Monchengladbach progress into German Cup quarterfinals
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修8 Module 3《Foreign Food》(外研版全国通用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:part1 选修8 unit4《Pygmalion》(新人教版全国通用)
微信“绿包”功能,当心抢红包变成发红包
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修7 Module 6《The World’s Cultural Heritage》(外研版全国通用)
体坛英语资讯:Alaves, Celta to vie for kings Cup final berth
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案五:倒装句
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:part1 选修7 unit5《Travelling abroad》(新人教版全国通用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法考点讲练:第八专题
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:part1 选修7 unit3《Under the sea》(新人教版全国通用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修6 Module 6《War and Peace》(外研版全国通用)
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M6 Unit 3《Understanding each other》
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修8 Module 6《The Tang Poems》(外研版全国通用)
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案十五:定语从句
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:M8 Unit2《Cloning》(新人教版广东专用)
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案七:定语从句
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修7 Module 5《Ethnic Culture》(外研版全国通用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法考点讲练:第二专题
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案十二:非谓语动词
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案一:冠词
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案三:主谓一致
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:part1 选修7 unit2《Robots》(新人教版全国通用)
川普重申美国对北约的支持
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法考点讲练:第十一专题
河北省鸡泽一中高三英语《主语从句》超全讲解加练习课件
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修8 Module 4《Which English》(外研版全国通用)
2011高考英语单选题分类汇编:情态动词、虚拟语气
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案十三:句子
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案十一:交际用语
高考英语第二轮语法专题复习教案四:虚拟语气
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |