A reader in Florida, apparentlybruised(擦伤)by some personal experience, writes in to complain, "If I steal a nickel's worth of merchandise, I am a thief and punished; but if I steal the love of another's wife, I am free."
This is a prevalentmisconception(误解,错觉)in many people's minds---that love, like merchandise, can be "stolen". Numerous states, in fact, have enacted laws allowing damages for "alienation of affections".
But love is not a commodity; the real thing cannot be bought, sold, traded or stolen. It is an act of the will, a turning of the emotions, a change in the climate of the personality.
When a husband or wife is "stolen" by another person, that husband or wife was already ripe for the stealing, was already predisposed toward a new partner. The "lovebandit(强盗,土匪)" was only taking what was waiting to be taken, what wanted to be taken.
We tend to treat persons like goods. We even speak of the children "belonging" to their parents. But nobody "belongs" to anyone else. Each person belongs to himself, and to God. Children are entrusted to their parents, and if their parents do not treat them properly, the state has a right to remove them from their parents' trusteeship.
Most of us, when young, had the experience of a sweetheart being taken from us by somebody more attractive and more appealing. At the time, we may have resented this intruder---but as we grew older, we recognized that the sweetheart had never been ours to begin with. It was not the intruder that "caused" the break, but the lack of a real relationship.
On the surface, many marriages seem to break up because of a "third party". This is, however, a psychological illusion. The other woman or the other man merely serves as a pretext for dissolving or a marriage that had already lost its essential integrity.
Nothing is more futile and more self-defeating than the bitterness of spurned love, the vengeful feeling that someone else has "come between" oneself and a beloved. This is always a distortion of reality, for people are not the captives or victims of others---they are free agents, working out their own destinies for good or for ill.
But the rejected lover or mate cannot afford to believe that his beloved has freely turned away from him--- and so he ascribes sinister or magical properties to the interloper. He calls him a hypnotist or a thief or a home-breaker. In the vast majority of cases, however, when a home is broken, the breaking has begun long before any "third party" has appeared on the scene.
2015考研英语大作文权威押题预测(五)
2015年考研英语一作文题目:情感
2015年考研英语一作文题目公布:教育类
2015考研英语作文:人生价值类模板
2015年考研英语一大作文参考范文
2015年考研英语一小作文参考范文及解析
2015考研英语大作文权威押题预测(七)
2015年考研英语(二)小作文参考范文
2015年考研英语二小作文范文参考
2015考研英语一作文(新发)
2015考研英语范文家庭关系类模板
2015考研英语二小作文
最新发布:2015年考研英语一大作文范文及解析
2015考研英语作文范文名师批改(十)
2015考研英语大作文范文
2015考研英语一范文(例文)
2015年考研英语二作文题目
2015考研英语写作范文
2015考研英语作文绝密押题预测(一)
考研英语作文的范文名师批改(十二)
2015年考研英语一大作文范文
研究生奖学金助学金政策解析
2015年考研英语一真题作文参考范文解析
首发:2015年考研英语小作文范文
2015年考研大作文范文及解析(英语一)
2015年考研英语二小作文范文2篇
2015考研英语一大作文解析及范文
2015考研英语一作文点评解析
考研网首发:2015年考研英语二小作文范文
2015考研英语作文绝密押题预测:文化交流类
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |