In 2009, Time magazine hailed School of One, an online math program piloted at three New York City public schools, as one of the year’s 50 best innovations. Each day, School of One software generated individualized math “playlists” for students who then chose the “modality” in which they wished to learn — software, a virtual teacher or a flesh-and-blood one. A different algorithm sorted teachers’ specialties and schedules to match a student’s needs. “It generates the lessons, the tests and it grades the tests,” one veteran instructor marveled. It saved salaries, too, thereby “teacher proofing” (as policy wonks say) education in a few clicks.
Although School of One made only modest improvements in students’ math scores and was adopted by only a handful of New York schools (not the 50 for which it was slated), it serves as a notable example of a pattern that Andrea Gabor, who holds the Bloomberg chair of business journalism at Baruch College/CUNY, charts in “After the Education Wars.” For more than three decades, an unlikely coalition of corporate philanthropists, educational technology entrepreneurs and public education bureaucrats has spearheaded a brand of school reform characterized by the overvaluing of technology and standardized testing and a devaluing of teachers and communities.
The trend can be traced back to a hyperbolic 1983 report, “A Nation at Risk,” issued by President Ronald Reagan’s National Commission on Excellence in Education. Against the backdrop of an ascendant Japanese economy and consistent with President Reagan’s disdain for public education (and teachers’ unions), “A Nation at Risk” blamed America’s ineffectual schools for a “rising tide of mediocrity” that was diminishing America’s global role in a new high-tech world.
Policymakers turned their focus to public education as a matter of national security, one too important (and potentially too profitable) to entrust to educators. The notion that top-down decisions by politicians, not teachers, should determine what children need was a thread running through the bipartisan 2001 No Child Left Behind Act, the Obama administration’s Race to the Top and state-initiated Common Core standards, and the current charter-driven agenda of Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos. “Accountability” became synonymous with standardized tests, resulting in a testing juggernaut with large profits going to commercial publishing giants like Pearson.
The education wars have been demoralizing for teachers, over 17 percent of whom drop out within their first five years. No one believes that teaching to the test is good pedagogy, but what are the options when students’ future educational choices, teachers’ salaries and retention and, in some states, the fate of entire schools rest on student test scores?
In meticulous if sometimes too laborious detail, Gabor documents reform’s institutional failings. She describes the sorry turns in New York City’s testing-obsessed policies, the undermining of Michigan’s once fine public schools (spurred in part by constant pressure from the DeVos family) and the heartbreaking failure of New Orleans to remake its schools after Hurricane Katrina. The largely white city establishment bypassed the majority-black community, inviting philanthropists and the federal government to rebuild its public schools as the nation’s first citywide, all-charter system. A dozen years later, more than a third of the city’s charter schools have failed.
GRE阅读:学术化代表措辞规范
新GRE考试阅读逻辑题练习(第四套)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析30
GRE阅读考试需具备哪些能力
新GRE考试阅读逻辑题练习(第六套)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析32
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(五十三)
GRE阅读考试话题功能段落解析
趣味GRE阅读:装忙族
新GRE阅读练习题(3)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(四十二)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析33
新GRE阅读考试长难句实例解析16
GRE阅读"排除题"解法
新GRE考试阅读逻辑题练习(第九套)
GRE阅读难句教程(3)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(四十一)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析36
趣味GRE阅读:相亲男女的几个谎言
GRE阅读长难句实例分析31
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(四十五)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(五十)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(五十二)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析35
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(三十五)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(五十一)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(三十二)
新GRE考试阅读逻辑题练习(第三套)
GRE阅读练习每日一篇(四十四)
GRE阅读长难句实例分析41
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |