NEW YORK, June 4 -- Blaming China for homegrown economic problems in the United States "is an unfortunate mechanism of political convenience," a leading U.S. economist has said.
"For far too long, Washington has entered into an unsustainable social contract with the American people -- a bloated healthcare sector, outsize military expenditures, and low taxes that require imported surplus saving and large trade deficits to fund this economic over-reach," said Stephen Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University's Jackson Institute of Global Affairs, in a recent email interview with Xinhua.
As an economy lacking in savings, the United States must import capital abroad from world's major surplus savers, including China, to invest and grow, the former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia said.
"The blame game" is only "identifying others as the culprit rather than admitting responsibility for deep-rooted problems," Roach said.
According to the senior economist, the U.S. net domestic saving rate in the first quarter of 2019 stood at 2.4 percent, "well less than half the 6.3 percent average that prevailed over the final three decades of the 20th century (from 1970-1999)."
He pointed out the notion that levying tariffs could help fix trade deficits "is factually and analytically wrong," since they cannot reduce the size and scope of the overall multilateral trade deficit.
Washington must figure out a way to start saving again if it does not want a trade deficit, however, the possibility seems unlikely in light of its large and rising budget deficits in the years ahead, Roach said.
The longtime expert on U.S.-China trade also said that the United States employs a false narrative on China by describing the country as an existential threat to Washington's economic future.
The allegations are based on weak evidence and neglect the fact that the same saving problems, which lead to trade deficits, will also inhibit America's potential to invest in its industries of the future, like 5G capabilities, he said.
"Blaming China for America's homegrown shortfalls in driving its own innovation model is yet another painfully unfortunate characteristic of a politically-inspired blame game," he also said.
"The politics of protectionism pose an existential threat to sustainable global economic activity," Roach warned. "Tit-for-tat tariffs will reduce economic activity in both the United States and China and will disrupt global activity through supply-chain linkages."
Supply chains are key to holding down global inflation while the risk of higher inflation and interest rates will only mount if they are disrupted, an outcome that has the potential to deal a devastating blow to global financial markets, according to Roach.
SAT阅读考试三大误区
SAT文章阅读模拟题之pesticides
SAT阅读考试考场答题方法介绍
SAT阅读考试应对策略三个
SAT阅读练习(三):SAT Sentence Completion 3
SAT阅读题型介绍与例题讲解
九道SAT阅读填空题练习
SAT文章阅读模拟题之minority business
如何备考SAT阅读考试最有效率?
提高SAT阅读速度的关键是理解
SAT文章阅读高分需要解决三个难题
SAT填空题核心解题原则两个
SAT阅读Sentence Completion练习题7
SAT阅读题Sentence Completion第四套
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 3
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 4
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 12
四个SAT文章阅读快速答题方法
SAT文章阅读的基本答题方法小结
SAT阅读答题技巧与题型分析
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 9
8道SAT完成句子题练习
SAT OG文章阅读题材总结
SAT阅读考试难度分析
SAT填空题练习题七道
如何准备SAT阅读考试?
SAT填空题考试要求及答题步骤
SAT阅读长难句6句分析
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(十)
怎样提高SAT阅读速度?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |