Download
The leaders of NATO's 28 member nations wrapped up their two-day summit on Monday with a set of measures and steps that brought to light the military bloc's deepening dilemma.
The so-called Smart Defense approach adopted by the alliance and the network of partnerships it is seeking to build around the world, coupled with a detailed exit from Afghanistan, all point to a declining and less capable NATO.
Capability building, partnership and Afghanistan dominated the Chicago summit, the biggest of its kind in history.
The Smart Defense notion was first broached by NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen in February 2011 in response to the financial constraints facing the transatlantic community and the yawning gap in defense capabilities between Washington and its European allies as a result of reduced European spending on defense for years.
The approach calls for pooling resources and capabilities of the member states to maintain and develop capabilities needed to confront the complex challenges of the 21st century, as stated in the strategic concept adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, when NATO leaders last met.
The Chicago summit saw a number of multinational projects unveiled, including a declared interim ballistic missile defense capability as an initial step to establish NATO's missile defense system, the deployment of a highly sophisticated Alliance Ground Surveillance system and the extension of the air policing mission in the Baltic states.
In addition, the summit sought to have on board more partner nations to make up for the capability deficiency resulting from member nations' refusal to engage in operations, as was the case in Libya.
US President Barack Obama on Monday afternoon hailed the role of partners as critical to NATO's operations after representatives of 13 partners engaged in the Afghan mission joined NATO leaders in Chicago.
At a news conference, the president even talked about the role partners could play in helping thwart terrorist threats in Yemen, Somalia and Mali, pointing to their "more effective intelligence operations, more diplomatic contacts."
Building on a transition plan agreed on at their Lisbon summit, NATO leaders finalized details in Chicago of the exit strategy from Afghanistan, foreseeing a change to a support role from the current combat mission by mid-2013 for NATO forces and the withdrawal of most NATO combat forces by the end of 2017, when Afghan forces are expected to take over the security lead across the country.
Though the Afghan war has entered its 11th year, the Taliban-led insurgency still has the ability to launch coordinated attacks in the most heavily fortified part of Kabul, Afghanistan's capital, and NATO's rushed exit will not contribute to a stable and peaceful Afghanistan.
However, the military alliance can no longer afford a prolonged war in Afghanistan, both financially and politically, if not morally.
At the Lisbon summit, NATO leaders pledged to adapt what they called the world's most successful political-military alliance to confront the 21st-century security challenges.
Analysts say Washington hopes NATO will continue to evolve to protect its members from new threats like ballistic missiles and cyber attacks, by preserving and developing essential defense capabilities.
The United States values the military bloc's role as the world's only institution capable of rapid and effective multilateral military action.
Questions:
1. Where did NATO just have a meeting?
2. What measures were adopted?
3. What is Smart Defense?
Answers:
1. Chicago.
2. Smart Defense approach and an initial step to establish NATO's missile defense system.
3. It calls for pooling resources and capabilities of member states to maintain and develop capabilities needed to confront the complex challenges of the 21st century.
About the broadcaster:
Nelly Min is an editor at China Daily with more than 10 years of experience as a newspaper editor and photographer. She has worked at major newspapers in the U.S., including the Los Angeles Times and the Detroit Free Press. She is also fluent in Korean.
从能力提升角度分析GMAT满分作文
GMAT写作issue如何高效备考
GMAT写作实用备考建议
GMAT写作模板如何正确使用
GMAT满分作文是怎样划分段落的
GMAT考试的写作公理有哪些
GMAT写作速度提升技巧介绍
GMAT写作英文思维如何培养
GMAT写作满分需要联想技巧
GMAT写作常见疑问解答
GMAT写作如何写出清晰的结构脉络
GMAT写作需要怎样的思维模式
GMAT写作自己的风格很重要
如何提升GMAT写作档次
GMAT写作如何规范布局
GMAT写作常见句式复习
GMAT满分作文是如何实现的
GMAT全球化的作文命题怎么写
GMAT写作如何转化经典句型
论GMAT写作风格的重要性
GMAT写作过渡修辞词汇整理
GMAT作文开篇需要掌握哪些语句
GMAT写作语言能力如何提升
详细分析GMAT写作中的经典题目
GMAT作文复议有哪些常识
GMAT写作快速提升有何经验
GMAT写作有哪些公理
GMAT写作常见话题介绍
GMAT写作是否需要明确立场
按部就班备考GMAT写作
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |