Controversial clauses that permit detention, arrest or surveillance of suspects at specific places, without informing their families, have been partially revised in response to an outcry to curb possible abuses of public security measures, as the latest amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law is tabled for lawmakers to read.
Clauses in the previous draft amendment to the law, which permit police to arrest suspects or hold them at a specific place under surveillance without telling their families, have been removed from the latest version delivered to the National People's Congress for a third review on Thursday.
The proposal requires public security to inform the suspect's family within 24 hours after arrest and surveillance, Wang Zhaoguo, vice-chairman of the National People's Congress Standing Committee, told members of the top legislature.
As for detention, the proposal still permits the police not to inform the family "if the case is related to state security or terrorism, and if telling families would impede the investigation", Wang said.The changes are made to ensure the rights of suspects, he said.
Thursday's proposal is also significant for "respecting and safeguarding human rights" as an essential principle in the proposed code. This is the first time this has been stated since the code was introduced in 1979.
Prior to this, the National People's Congress Standing Committee had already reviewed stipulations in August and December, and had included major refinements such as the prohibition of forced confession under torture.
Dai Yuzhong, a member of the inspection committee under the Supreme People's Procuratorate, said in the new draft amendment that the modifications of evidence, defense, enforcement measures, investigation, as well as trial systems, all, to some extent, embody the protection of human rights.
Dai acknowledged that sometimes the police use torture to force suspects to make confessions.
The draft amendment has made clear that confessions extorted through illegal means, such as torture, should be excluded from evidence during trial.
Questions:
1. When was the third review delivered to the NPC?
2. Under the proposal when should a suspect’s family be informed?
3. When was the code first introduced?
Answers:
1. Thursday.
2. within 24 hours.
3. 1979.
少儿英语圣经故事105:All things for god万事效力
少儿英语圣经故事58:In the Beginning起初
少儿英语圣经故事101:Turly I am thy servant我真是你的仆人
少儿英语圣经故事80:Obedience听话
少儿英语圣经故事44:Elisha以利沙(1)
少儿英语圣经故事32:Pete learns to Control His Words彼得的口
少儿英语圣经故事46:Elisha以利沙(3)
少儿英语圣经故事81:Decision决定
少儿英语圣经故事70:Humble谦卑
少儿英语圣经故事59:In the Beginning起初
少儿英语圣经故事84:Do choose做选择
少儿英语圣经故事64:Waiting等待
少儿英语圣经故事96:I will come again我会再来
少儿英语圣经故事76:Be not afraid不要怕
少儿英语圣经故事90:What’s right赐平安的主
少儿英语圣经故事98:God first以神为首
少儿英语圣经故事87:I am the Resurrecion复活在我
少儿英语圣经故事60:In the Beginning起初
少儿英语圣经故事107:Covereth his sins遮掩过犯
少儿英语圣经故事63:Temptation试探
少儿英语圣经故事73:Compain抱怨
少儿英语圣经故事104:Seek ye first先求它的国
少儿英语圣经故事103:Obey顺从
少儿英语圣经故事94:Checkup:Don’t give in不要妥协
少儿英语圣经故事95:Seek the first Kingdom of God先求他的国
少儿英语圣经故事66:Forgiving饶恕
少儿英语圣经故事102:He is lord他是主
少儿英语圣经故事61:Jealousy嫉妒
少儿英语圣经故事54:Daniel但以理(5)
少儿英语圣经故事93:An example of the belivever做众人的榜样
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |