Controversial clauses that permit detention, arrest or surveillance of suspects at specific places, without informing their families, have been partially revised in response to an outcry to curb possible abuses of public security measures, as the latest amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law is tabled for lawmakers to read.
Clauses in the previous draft amendment to the law, which permit police to arrest suspects or hold them at a specific place under surveillance without telling their families, have been removed from the latest version delivered to the National People's Congress for a third review on Thursday.
The proposal requires public security to inform the suspect's family within 24 hours after arrest and surveillance, Wang Zhaoguo, vice-chairman of the National People's Congress Standing Committee, told members of the top legislature.
As for detention, the proposal still permits the police not to inform the family "if the case is related to state security or terrorism, and if telling families would impede the investigation", Wang said.The changes are made to ensure the rights of suspects, he said.
Thursday's proposal is also significant for "respecting and safeguarding human rights" as an essential principle in the proposed code. This is the first time this has been stated since the code was introduced in 1979.
Prior to this, the National People's Congress Standing Committee had already reviewed stipulations in August and December, and had included major refinements such as the prohibition of forced confession under torture.
Dai Yuzhong, a member of the inspection committee under the Supreme People's Procuratorate, said in the new draft amendment that the modifications of evidence, defense, enforcement measures, investigation, as well as trial systems, all, to some extent, embody the protection of human rights.
Dai acknowledged that sometimes the police use torture to force suspects to make confessions.
The draft amendment has made clear that confessions extorted through illegal means, such as torture, should be excluded from evidence during trial.
Questions:
1. When was the third review delivered to the NPC?
2. Under the proposal when should a suspect’s family be informed?
3. When was the code first introduced?
Answers:
1. Thursday.
2. within 24 hours.
3. 1979.
fairly, quite, rather, very 与 pretty的用法区别
频度副词在否定句中的用法
如何用英语表示“年轻一代”
this和that的副词用法
谈谈频度副词位于句末的用法
如何用英语表示“高等教育”
最高级前不用the的五种情况
as often as及其他
比较等级的修饰语小结
副词little可修饰哪些比较级
dead可以有比较级吗
比较等级的特殊句型归纳
谈谈比较级前冠词的使用
类似deep与deeply副词的区别
表否定意义的little可修饰比较吗
副词how的用法搭配归纳
形容词和副词比较级的常用句型及应用
英语时态考题的常见考点归纳
副词little可修饰哪些动词
疑问副词的概念及用法说明
比较等级的常见句型归纳
如何对频度副词提问
副词abroad用法说明
形容词与副词比较等级的构成方法
含有比较级的几个有用习语
是a better voice还是the better voice
first与at first用法区别详解
什么叫连接副词
in case用作副词性短语
very, much 与 very much的用法区别
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |