In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, or animal products for clothing and medicine, for example. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Trying to live without exploiting animals for food, clothing or medicine can be a healthy lifestyle, except that that would probably never become a fashion. People in the modern world seem to agree that it is not 100 percent justified to eat meat, clothe in leather, or use animals as medical research subjects; nevertheless, very few people would like to choose to live the vegan way for the benefits of animals, people and the planet. The case for animal rights is likely to go nowhere simply because people can have a choice but animals cannot.
It would be out of the question to imagine that non-human animals could voice their own opinions. As it is, the question whether animals have rights as humans do has never been considered seriously. More recently, however, pro-animal and vegan groups have joined forces in supporting one basic right for animals: the right not to be property. Roughly speaking, people take it for granted that they own the world which they actually do. Of course, the animal welfare movement is being promoted to illustrate no more than moral conscience, certainly with little, if any, cognitive knowledge of, or obvious understanding from animals themselves. As a result, amid various points of view, a parallel argument is that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals as resources so long as there is no unnecessary suffering.
On the other hand, even today common sense seems to imply that humans are licensed to kill animals for food, clothing or medicine. As if authorized by Heaven, people also make animals suffer in other things, including hard labor in farms and transportation as well as entertainment in circus shows. Discussed as a whole, this is more an issue on habitual necessity, or religious, ethnic and health backgrounds, rather than on mere survival . Although the vegan way of life is a healthy choice, most people cannot accept eating a plant-based diet, nor can they avoid using animal by-products for many purposes. Given that plants can theoretically feed, cover and cure, there is nothing like what comes from animals. In short, talking about sparing animals and leaving them alone is too cheap to carry weight since not every person is willing to be a vegan in the real sense of the word.
In all appearances, the animal debate attracts some attention but does not lead to enough action to reduce the pain of animals. Without wearing something like leather jackets and knowing to use medicines from animals, for instance, humans are in part similar to the omnivorous rats that eat anything . So, it is next to impossible for people to change the carnivorous habits and become entirely herbivorous because humans are not born vegans.
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮书面表达选析(4)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题2 完形填空 2.2
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮书面表达选析(3)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题1 单项填空 1.9定语从句
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题1 单项填空 1.11特殊句式和主谓一致
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题4 阅读填句 4.1
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题1 单项填空 1.4动词和动词短语
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮阅读理解基础练习(2)
2016届江苏常州市高考英语二轮阅读理解训练(3)
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮书面表达选析(5)
阿里巴巴展现打假决心! 首告淘宝售假店主索赔140万!
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题1 单项填空 1.7情态动词和虚拟语气
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题6 书面表达 6.3
离婚后会发生哪些美好的事情呢
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题4 阅读填句 4.2
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题3 阅读理解 3.4
福建省2016届高考英语二轮突破新题型训练:(泉州市永春三中 叶美珍)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题1 单项填空 1.10状语从句
2016届江苏常州市高考英语二轮阅读理解训练(4)
福建省2016届高考英语二轮突破新题型训练:(泉州市永春一中 林雄凤)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题2 完形填空 2.4
2016届安徽芜湖市高考英语二轮阅读理解基础练习(4)
死去的老鼠 The Dead Mouse
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题4 阅读填句 4.3
福建省2016届高考英语二轮突破新题型训练:(泉州市石狮永宁中学 赵志陶)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题3 阅读理解 3.1
2016届江苏常州市高考英语二轮阅读理解训练(1)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题3 阅读理解 3.3
福建省2016届高考英语二轮突破新题型训练:(泉州五中黄金丽)
2016届高三英语二轮随堂训练课件:专题5 短文改错 5.1
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |