Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
2015考研英语阅读腐败之都
2015考研英语阅读非常蟑螂
2015考研英语阅读纽特金里奇的竞选
2015考研英语阅读要太空望远镜吗
2015考研英语阅读电力
2015考研英语阅读这片儿我说了算
2015考研英语阅读潜意识
2015考研英语阅读制表大师乔治
2015考研英语阅读Facebook在逆流中前行
2015考研英语阅读永无止境的欲望
2015考研英语阅读埃利布罗德
2015考研英语阅读戴蒙亚邦的新音乐剧
2015考研英语阅读优衣库占据中国市场
2015考研英语阅读欧洲高尔夫球王
2015考研英语阅读强生公司走出困境
2015考研英语阅读城市里的种族隔离
2015考研英语阅读印度航空业
2015考研英语阅读科学究竟有什么用
2015考研英语阅读书卷中的英伦风光
2015考研英语阅读管理真言
2015考研英语阅读印度的日用消费品
2015考研英语阅读全球防虫的危险
2015考研英语阅读对冲基金的成功
2015考研英语阅读沙滩上的爱因斯坦
2015考研英语阅读地景艺术
2015考研英语阅人英国二战女特工
2015考研英语阅读堕落的爱
2015考研英语阅读伦敦巫术
2015考研英语阅读开启黑人牧师时代
2015考研英语阅读上世纪的名流
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |