Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
培养GRE数学解题思维
GRE数学中容易混淆的词汇
GRE数学高分精髓
GRE数学机经怎么合理利用
GRE数学:打好临场准备战
GRE数学解法之作图法
GRE数学如何冲刺
GRE数学:调整心态
GRE数学:排列组合
GRE数学高频考点之Algebraic Fraction
GRE数学机经你会使用吗?
GRE数学基本概念
怎样告别GRE数学粗心的大难题?
GRE数学难点解析
如何彻底克服GRE数学粗心问题
GRE数学高频词汇I-N
GRE数学:五个注意
GRE数学高分备考策略
GRE数学必备基本知识点
举例说明GRE数学遇到不懂单词后怎么办
GRE数学数据充分性题目解题方法
五十道GRE数学考试疑难练习题
GRE数学解题方法全面分析
GRE数学 练习才是王道
GRE数学考试你必须知道的考点
GRE数学容易出错的题型
想要GRE数学考试题上手快就要多练习
GRE数学符号英文表达
GRE数学:数学符号中英对照
GRE数学:做题方法精粹
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |