Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
北京市教委:小升初特长生不能跨区就学
【小升初】东城“小升初”先推优后特长
北京市各区2010小升初派位分配比例及人数
海淀区小升初推优政策出炉 班干部加分降低
2010北京小升初东城区政策 优质校参与派位
北京部分区县 2010小升初特长生报名限制取消
朝阳小升初推优力度加大 推优生增至600人
【小升初】小升初面试中孩子需要注意的事项
小升初面试技巧:根据简历猜题目
西城小升初电脑大派位今年四中八中首招派位生
海淀朝阳外地生享同城待遇 可推优特长派位
小升初家长经验分享:2010小升初推优成功谈
朝阳新增13所小升初推优校 推优数增加530个
小升初参考:09海淀初中入学推荐分配具体安排
海淀区体质监测成绩直接挂钩明年小升初推优
人大附中小升初面试题汇编6
自办校学生小升初没有“电脑派位”机会
小升初推优:北京中小学三好生体质标准降5分
2010小升初朝阳几所重点初中校点评
2010海淀小升初体育特长生测试地点紧急通知
小升初:北京市教委暂不取消小升初特长生
2010小升初参考:09海淀三类学生干部可加分
海淀小升初推优政策
北京西城中小学外地生 提供暂住证户口可入学
人大附中小升初面试题汇编2
西城区09小升初推优标准以及日程安排表及其他
小升初家长必备:培养小升初特长生家长须知
北京多个区县敲定2010小升初推优比例
小升初关注:小学市级三好学生评选有哪些条件
文件:朝阳区2010小升初入学政策及推优方案
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |