Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
乐静:2014雅思阅读战报
2014年下半年雅思写作真题类型分析:大作文和小作文
对2014雅思写作考题回忆
2014雅思口语Part1考题回忆
雅思考试之写作题目回忆
乐静:雅思阅读战报
2014雅思口语考试的回忆
2014雅思口语考试点评
上海2014年雅思考试第一时间回忆
2014雅思写作总结
上海2014年的雅思考试回忆
2014年的雅思考试写作题目
上海:2014雅思考试回忆
2014年的雅思考试口语回忆(持续更新)
雅思考试口语的回忆
2014雅思笔试回忆:听力、阅读、作文
2014雅思笔试回忆:听力和阅读(网友版)
对2014雅思口语考试回忆(持续更新中)
2014雅思写作题目+7.5分原创范文
上海2014年雅思考试回忆
2014下半年雅思G类写作真题汇总
2014雅思写作A类TASK 2原创范文
2014雅思A类考试写作题目网友分享
2014下半年雅思写作大作文真题类型分析
郑仁强:2014雅思写作题目+7分范文
2014雅思口语考题回忆:Part2
对2014雅思考试作文的回忆
2014雅思考试写作的题目
2014下半年雅思写作小作文真题类型分析
2014雅思考试口语回忆(持续更新中)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |