Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
中考英语阅读有诀窍 多读多听找语感
如何走出中学英语词汇学习误区
张澄老师谈:中考100天英语规划复习二三事
2013年北京中考大事早知道
2012年北京各区一二模考试时间汇总
2011年中考家长必看的6点行为手册
2013年北京中考大事早知道
2011北京海淀区中考一模分数段公布
中考政策变化 会考首次全市统一考试网上阅卷
学会如何猜测词义 提升中考阅读水平(二)
北京中考:海淀一模前500可报人大附
2011年中考来临拿什么帮助你的孩子
2012年北京中考英语考试说明解读
2013中考新变化 英语考试增加测试口语
2011年北京中考时间确定为6月24日
中考一模考试英语阅读决胜四大妙招
海南酝酿中考改革 改变成绩呈现方式
2011年北京各区中考一模试卷分析(视频)
中考心理专家指导:把焦虑的事列成清单
名师指导:新初三暑秋英语学习规划
2012北京中考英语考生考前必读
中考填报 考生会犯四点“常规错误”
2011年中考英语命题趋势及备考策略(视频)
北京中考:朝阳区一模前500可报八十中
中考最后冲刺:如何提高英语考试成绩?
学会如何猜测词义 提升中考阅读水平(一)
中考前家长对孩子要“多看少说”
2012年北京市中考英语考试说明
专家建议:孩子学习英语 最好先培养兴趣
2011北京中考政策解读 把握“一变三微调”
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |