Laws of Nature, however, are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the same word is unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities of Nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law-giver. Incidentally, it might just as well imply a parliament or soviet of atoms. But the difference between the two uses of the word is fundamental. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of Nature it is not punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated, It is quite probable that every law of Nature so far stated has been stated incorrectly. Certainly many of them have. Nevertheless, these inaccurately stated laws are of immense practical and theoretical value.
They fall into two classes-qualitative laws such as All animals with feathers have beaks, and quantitative laws such as Mercury has 13,596 times the density of water. The first of these is a very good guide. But it was probably not true in the past. For many birds which were certainly feathered had teeth and may not have had beaks. And it is quite possibly not today. There are about a hundred thousand million birds on our planet, and it may well be that two or three of them are freaks which have not developed a beak. But have lived long enough to grow feathers. It was thought to be a law of Nature that female mammals had mammary glands, until Prof. Crew of Edinburgh found that many congenitally hairless female mice lacked these organs, though they could bear young which other females could then foster.
And quantitative laws generally turn out to be inexact. Thus water is nothing definite. It is a mixture of at least six different substances. For in the molecule H20, one or both of the hydrogen atoms may be either light or heavy, and so may the oxygen atom. Similarly, mercury consists of several different types of atom. Thus the ratio of the densities of mercury and water is not fixed, though in the case of ordinary samples the variation is too small to be detected. But it can be detected if the water happens to have been taken from an accumulator which has been used for some time.
In his theory of Probability Jefferys has something new to say about induction. Two contradictory theories are in vogue as to the laws of Nature. The older view is that they are absolute, though of course they may have been inaccurately formulated. The extreme positivistic view, enunciated by Vaihinger, is that we can only say that phenomena occur as if certain laws held. There is no sense in making any definite statements, though it is convenient to do so.
Now Jeffreys points out that, if a number of observations have been found to conform to a law, it is highly probable that the next one will do so whether the law is true or not. In Jeffreys words A well-verified hypothesis will probably continue to lead to correct inferences even if it is wrong.
Positivists and idealists have made great play with the fact that many laws of Nature, as formulated by scientists, have turned out to be inexact, and all may do so. But that is absolutely no reason for saying that there are no regularities in Nature to which our statements of natural law correspond. One might as well say that because no maps of England give its shape exactly it has no shape.
2011年实用口语练习:Select courses 选课
2011年实用口语练习:昙花一现式的一夜成名
9句狠话教你怎么用英语让人“滚开”
2011年实用口语练习:不只是裸露这么简单
英语口语-害羞
如何用英文表达“我不太想做某事”
英语口语-商业谨致问候语
张柏芝谢霆锋正式离婚(双语)
英语口语:怎样放“狠话”让对方离你远点
2011年实用口语练习:各种哭的说法(一)
2011年实用口语练习:劝君“上当”一回
如何提高英语口语
2011年实用口语练习:当猪飞起来的时候
实用口语:关于衣服的必备短语
2011年实用口语练习:今天我做东
2011年实用口语练习:出恭的各种表达
2011年实用口语练习:我办事你放心
英语口语-商业信函用语引言
男生女生:我们可以只当朋友吗?
2011年实用口语练习:与天气有关的口语(下)
2011年实用口语练习:你把事情搞砸了
2011年实用口语练习:有钱人 称心如意
2011年实用口语练习:In the bookstore 在书店里
2011年实用口语练习:不得不分
2011年实用口语练习:“锅中的火花”
2011年实用口语练习:遮人耳目
2011年实用口语练习:At the post office 在邮局
2011年实用口语练习:你担心什么呢?
英文各种各样的“钱”你都认识么?
2011年实用口语练习:“挑刺儿”
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |