Work and PlayWhat do we mean by leisure, and why should we assume that it represents a problem to b
What do we mean by leisure, and why should we assume that it represents a problem to be solved by the arts? The great ages of art were not conspicuous for their leisure at least, art was not an activity associated with leisure. It was a craft like any other, concerned with the making of necessary things. Leisure, in the present meaning of the word, did not exist. Leisure, before the Industrial Revolution, meant no more than time or opportunity If your leisure served, I would speak with you. says one of Shakespeares characters. Phrases which we still use, such as at your leisure , preserve this original meaning.
But when we speak of leisure nowadays, we are not thinking of securing time or opportunity to do something; time is heavy on our hands, and the problem is how to fill it. Leisure no longer signifies a space with some difficulty secured against the pressure of events: rather it is a pervasive emptiness for which we must invent occupations. Leisure is a vacuum, a desperate state of vacancy a vacancy of mind and body. It has been commandeered by the sociologists and the psychologists: it is a problem.
Our diurnal existence is divided into two phases, as distinct as day and night. We call them work and play. We work so many hours a day, and, when we have allowed the necessary minimum for such activities as eating and shopping, the rest we spend in various activities which are known as recreations, an elegant word which disguises the fact that we usually do not even play in our hours of leisure, but spend them in various forms of passive enjoyment or entertainment not football but watching football matches; not acting, but theatre-going; not walking, but riding in a motor coach.
We need to make, therefore, a hard-and-fast distinction not only between work and play but, equally, between active play and passive entertainment. It is, I suppose, the decline of active play of amateur sport and the enormous growth of purely receptive entertainment which has given rise to a sociological interest in the problem. If the greater part of the population, instead of indulging in sport, spend their hours of leisure viewing television programmes, there will inevitably be a decline in health and physique. And, in addition, there will be a psychological problem, for we have yet to trace the mental and moral consequences of a prolonged diet of sentimental or sensational spectacles on the screen. There is, if we are optimistic, the possibility that the diet is too thin and unnourishing to have much permanent effect on anybody. Nine films out of ten seem to leave absolutely no impression on the mind or imagination of those who see them: few people can give a coherent account of the film they saw the week before last, and at longer intervals they must rely on the management to see that they do not sit through the same film twice.
We have to live art if we would be affected by art. We have to paint rather than look at paintings, to play instruments rather than go to concerts, to dance and sing and act ourselves, engaging all our senses in the ritual and discipline of the arts. Then something may begin to happen to us: to work upon our bodies and our souls.
It is only when entertainment is active, participated in, practiced, that it can properly be called play, and as such it is a natural use of leisure. In that sense play stands in contrast to work, and is usually regarded as an activity that alternates with work. It is there that the final and most fundamental error enters into our conception of daily life.
Work itself is not a single concept. We say quite generally that we work in order to make a living: to earn, that is to say, sufficient tokens which we can exchange for food and shelter and all the other needs of our existence. But some of us work physically, cultivating the land, minding the machines, digging the coal; others work mentally, keeping accounts, inventing machines, teaching and preaching, managing and governing. There does not seem to be any factor common to all these diverse occupations, except that they consume our time, and leave us little leisure.
We may next observe that one mans profession or work is often another mans recreation or play. The merchant at the weekend becomes a hunter ; the clerk becomes a gardener; the machine-tender becomes a breeder of bull-terriers - There is a profound moral behind that story of Stevensons, for the compensation which a disintegrated personality may seek will often be of an anti-social nature. The Nazi party, for example, in its early days was largely recruited from the bored not so much from the unemployed as from the street-corner society of listless hooligans.
Scientific studies have been made of street-corner society, out of which crime, gangsterdom, and fascism inevitably develop. It is a society with leisure that is to say, spare time and without compensatory occupation. It does not need a Satan to find mischief for such idle hands. They will spontaneously itch to do something: muscles have a life of their own unless they are trained to purposeful actions. Actions, or rather activities, are the obvious reflex to leisure; they consume it, and leave the problem solved.
But work is also activity, and if we reach the conclusion that all our time must be filled with one activity or another, the distinction between work and play becomes rather meaningless, and what we mean by play is merely a change of occupation. We pass from one form of activity to another; one we call work, and for that we receive pay; the other we call play, and for that we receive no pay on the contrary, we probably pay a subscription.
1. The Industrial Revolution brought about a change in the nature of peoples work as well as in the amount of time it took.
2. Passive entertainment, which has increased in our age, leads to a decline in health and may also create psychological problems.
3. The division of activities into work and play is unsatisfactory because it conceals the important distinction between active entertainment and passive entertainment.
4. Mental work is more beneficial to ones psychology than physical work.
5. The Nazi party was mostly enrolled from the jobless.
6. TV programs should be abandoned because they entertain viewers passively.
7. The word leisure has completely changed its original meanings.
8. Danger may arise if work and play are not______coordinated.
9. When entertainment is active, play can serve as an activity that______work.
10. One man may perceive another mans recreation as______.
答案:
I. Y 2. Y 3. Y 4. NG 5. N 6. N 7. N 8. properly 9. alternates with 10. profession
一个月突破雅思6.5:熟能生巧英语没有捷径的
雅思学员的那成长之路:从入门到高分
20天实现留英的梦想IT理工男的雅思写作6分之路
短期冲刺雅思的7.5分在“蜕变”的四个阶段
老师助我拿下雅思的好成绩30天备考爱上英语学习
一战雅思听力的9分学霸经验分享
雅思考不出,GPA不达标,名校没问题的!
雅思高分的学员:听说读写全方位盘点雅思心得
雅思高分学员的心得:勤能补拙耕耘收获
学霸16天拿下雅思8分的好成绩冲刺英国巴斯大学
21天拿下雅思阅读8分的经验的分享
雅思的学管:让你疯狂的爱上学习
英语专业的烤鸭9天突破雅思8分练题在精不在多
高分学员的心得:从“哑巴英语”到雅思7.5的转变
从高考失利到Offer满手一个月收获雅思的7.5
雅思的故事:VIP托管班的非雅思学生
四战雅思不言败两周的备考突破雅思7分
雅思听力阅读双8分的经验:英语学习没有捷径
一对一的指导:雅思听力8分不是梦!
雅思欢乐的6人班:三周人人进步0.5分
雅思的一对一:有理有据实现口语突破
雅思高分的学霸备考之路分享
雅思阅读8分学员备考的经验及教训分享
雅思阅读听力的双满分经验:平时积累很重要
雅思口语的7分感想:口语决定听力
20天斩下雅思6.5分获悉尼大学传媒专业的预科录取
从“菜鸟”进阶为“高分烤鸭” 的改变
一对一的指导7节课提高雅思写作1.5分
两周提高雅思口语1分的经验的分享
雅思高分学员的故事:我的雅思心得
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |