67
President Clintons decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on Chinas entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and Whit House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked the courage to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop.
In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administrations goal of a bullet-proof agreement that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.
THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, were not there yet, according to senior officials.
Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although Clinton can signal U.S. approval for Chinas entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms and Emest F. Hollings promised to introduce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal.
The hidden message from these three textile-state Southerners: Get more protection for the U. S. clothing industry. Hoping to smooth the way, the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on cultural restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing.
BIG JOB. Already, business lobbyists are blanketing Capitol Hill to presale any eventual agreement, but what theyve heard so far isnt encouraging. Republicans, including Lott, say that the time just isnt right for the deal. Translation: Were determined to make it look as if Clinton has capitulated to the Chinese and is ignoring human, religious, and labor rights violations; the theft of nuclear-weapons technology; and the sale of missile parts to Americas enemies. Beijings fierce critics within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Paul D. Wellstone of Minnesota and House Minority leader Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, wont help, either.
Just how tough the lobbying job on Capitol Hill will be become clear on Apr. 20, when Rubin lectured 19chief executives on the need to discipline their Republican allies. With business and the White House still trading charges over who is responsible for the defeat of fast-track trade negotiating legislation in 1997, working together wont be easy. And Republicanswith a winksay that theyll eventually embrace Chinas entry into the WTO as a favor to Corporate America. Though not long before they torture Clinton. But Zhu is out on a limb, and if Congress overdoes the criticism, he may be forced by domestic critics to renege. Business must make this much dear to both its GOP allies and the Whit House: This historic deal is too important to risk losing to any more partisan squabbling
1 The main idea of this passage is
[A]. The Contradiction between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. [B]. On Chinas entry into WTO.
[C]. Clinton was right. [D]. Business Lobbyists Control Capitol Hill.
2 What does the sentence Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, Detroit convey?
[A]. Premier Zhu rejected their requirements. [B]. The three places overdid criticism.
[C]. They wanted more protection. [D]. They are in trouble.
3 What was the attitude of the Republican Party toward Chinas entry into the WTO?
[A]. Contradictory. [B].Appreciative .[C]. Disapproving. [D]. Detestful.
4 Who plays the leading part in the deal in America?
[A]. White House . [B]. Republicans. [C]. The Democratic Party. [D]. Businessmen.
5 It can be inferred from the passage that
[A]. America will make concessions.
[B]. America will hold out for a better WTO
[C]. Clinton has the right to signal U. S. approval for Chinas entry.
[D]. Democratic party approve Chinas entry into the WTO.
参考答案:CAADA
雅思快速阅读方法详细内容
巧用并列型结构 秒杀雅思阅读"奇葩"题型
雅思阅读文章的结构阅读法介绍
雅思阅读复习:语法的作用
雅思阅读文章规律分析
雅思阅读技巧:长难句如何处理
雅思阅读实力提升两招:吃定单词+啃透长句
提高雅思阅读速度:行之有效三方法
如何在雅思阅读中抓中心词
雅思阅读:剑四高频词汇总结
如何达到雅思阅读的巅峰境界
考生常遇到的雅思阅读考试问题
雅思阅读“段落标题”的趋势阅读法
雅思阅读高分要点:考前浏览
雅思阅读备考不可忽视图表题
雅思阅读多重选择题的解题方法
雅思阅读路上4只拦路虎
雅思阅读实用技巧介绍:平行阅读法
雅思阅读四大障碍的解决方法
雅思阅读判断技巧与猜测词义技巧
攻克雅思阅读难题需要学会西方思维
什么样的雅思阅读策略才适合我们
雅思阅读 隐性考点与零考点原则
雅思阅读复习要点:多记单词勤总结
雅思快速阅读方法:Scanning
雅思阅读4大难点逐个突破
透析雅思阅读失分的原因及解决办法
雅思阅读词汇:心理词汇
详解雅思阅读段落标题的解法
雅思阅读判断题的快速解题法
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |