Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage:
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
答案
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:公司要跟我续约
职场英语口语情景交际之出差与抱怨篇:你也可以做飞机去出差
职场英语口语情景交际之出差与抱怨篇:简直把人热得喘不上气来
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我这一周的会议都耽误了
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:为什么你想辞去现在这个工作来我们公司?
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:毕业后出国深造还是找工作?
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:给新来的同事介绍工作
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:你可以搬到好一点的公寓去了
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:咱们办公室有什么资讯吗?
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:面试简单开场白二
职场英语口语情景交际之出差与抱怨篇:从上海回来后就一直气色不太好
职场英语口语情景交际之加薪与升职篇:有一个销售经理的职位空缺
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我想我这些年的薪水太低了
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:我想知道能不能在这儿实习
职场英语口语情景交际之加薪与升职篇:升职后比以前更忙了
职场英语口语情景交际之假期与请假篇:合理的安排假期活动
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:我认为我的背景和经验非常适合这个工作
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:时差的原因让我感觉很累
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我通常一年去两次伦敦
职场英语口语情景交际之出差与抱怨篇:我下周要去广州出差
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我这些年里一共去了三次上海
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:老板居然让我和迈克共事
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:能给我谈谈你的突出业绩吗?
职场英语口语情景交际之面试与实习篇:你是一个有明确目标的人吗?
职场英语口语情景交际之出差与抱怨篇:西安的工程出了点儿问题
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我也很就进入中年了
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:你能指导我写述职报告吗?
职场英语口语情景交际之假期与请假篇:北京也很有意思
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:我认为你对这个主题非常了解
职场英语口语情景交际之同事之间篇:希望能够参观一下你新装修的家
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |