Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage:
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy and stagnation. Too much conflict leads to divisiveness and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
31. In the eyes of the author, conventional opinion on conflict is .
A) wrong C) misleading
B) oversimplified D) unclear
32. Professor Charles R. Schwenks research shows .
A) the advantages and disadvantages of conflict
B) the real value of conflict
C) the difficulty in determining the optimal level of conflict
D) the complexity of defining the roles of conflict
33. We can learn from Schwenks research that .
A) a persons view of conflict is influenced by the purpose of his organization
B) conflict is necessary for managers of for-profit organizations
C) different people resolve conflicts in different ways
D) it is impossible for people to avoid conflict
34. The passage suggests that in for-profit organization .
A) there is no end of conflict
B) expression of different opinions is encouraged
C) decisions must be justifiable
D) success lies in general agreement
35. People working in a not-for-profit organization .
A) seem to be difficult to satisfy
B) are free to express diverse opinions
C) are less effective in making decisions
D) find it easier to reach agreement
答案
31.B 32.C 33.A 34.D 35.B
SAT阅读习题7 含中文注释
SAT阅读剖析与要点解读
SAT阅读SPP策略(二)
SAT阅读假设题解题思路
SAT阅读:Dopamine and Learning
SAT阅读题三大特色
sat阅读:How the Steel Was Tempered
SAT阅读材料 gene regulatory network
SAT阅读:The Great Gatsby
如何掌握SAT阅读的技巧
SAT阅读之假设题解题思路:理解与推理
分享我的SAT阅读经验
sat阅读:Speech and Harm and SAT Trick
SAT阅读方法与原则
SAT阅读高分备考经验
SAT阅读技巧:如何到原文中定位
SAT阅读英文小说推荐 5部
SAT阅读试题结构
如何提高SAT阅读能力
SAT阅读逻辑题解析
SAT阅读素材:Modern urban design
SAT阅读:American Academy of Arts and Sciences
SAT阅读考试的五个建议
做SAT阅读 要思维转变
SAT阅读考试高分宝典
SAT阅读资料推荐
SAT阅读考试经验总结
SAT阅读素材:Hoover Dam Architectural style
教你SAT阅读如何突破740
SAT阅读与托福阅读的区别
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |