Passage Three
Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage.
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any childs intellectual level, the better for the child in question.
31.Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?
A)Its validity was challenged by many communities.
B)It was considered discriminative against minority children.
C)It met with strong opposition from the majority of black parents.
D)It deprived the black children of their rights to a good education.
32.The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to .
A)draw public attention to IQ testing
B) put an end to special education
C) remove the states ban on intelligence tests
D) have their children enter white schools
33.The author believes that intelligence testing .
A)may ease racial confrontation in the United States
B)can encourage black children to keep up with white children
C)may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States
D)can help black parents make decisions about their childrens education
34.The authors opinion of child adoption seems to be that .
A)no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B) white families should adopt black children
C) adoption should be based on IQ test results
D) cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
35.Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that .
A)good will may sometimes complicate racial problems
B)social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children
C)intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas
D)American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues
参考答案
31.B 32.C 33.D 34.A 35.D
词汇难关记忆雅思单词20个经典方法特别推荐
评上半年雅思IELTS作文预测下半年作文题目
雅思考试呈现火爆升值成都考生陡增六成
雅思高分经验分享
老师披露自己的烤鸭经历
高分考生分享备考雅思
结果出人意料雅思口语9分如何炼成
二十天雅思考试拿7分高分考生分享成功经验
助考雅思考生权威建议复习技巧
大作文也有灵魂雅思考试写作8分考生回忆录
雅思暑期雅思特训辅导
雅思考生出现低龄化趋势专家提醒报考需冷静
雅思考试写作口语引入半分
雅思复习攻略与经验技巧
如何改变雅思喜欢使用华丽辞藻的强迫心态
考前一个月快速准备雅思写作写读改三步走
考雅思也可申请美国顶级名校时机越早越好
非英专业雅思高分不靠机经
高三雅思8分高手公布学习秘诀积累也有窍门
900美国院校认雅思中国考生创新高
雅思高分不等于英国硕士学位要谨防高分低能
近万名香港大学生参加雅思评核计划
雅思口语教师支招两三月提高口语
专家助考雅思考生权威建议复习技巧
全方位应对雅思变化成为超级考生
雅思写作高分十大理由及9月作文题预测
雅思实施新政报考人数成倍增长
雅思名师严春华灵动严绎妙笔生华
雅思考试写作中不该用的减分表达方式
自学49天雅思考试得7分高人传授备考高招
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |