Passage Three
Questions 31 to 35 are based on the following passage.
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any childs intellectual level, the better for the child in question.
31.Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?
A)Its validity was challenged by many communities.
B)It was considered discriminative against minority children.
C)It met with strong opposition from the majority of black parents.
D)It deprived the black children of their rights to a good education.
32.The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to .
A)draw public attention to IQ testing
B) put an end to special education
C) remove the states ban on intelligence tests
D) have their children enter white schools
33.The author believes that intelligence testing .
A)may ease racial confrontation in the United States
B)can encourage black children to keep up with white children
C)may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States
D)can help black parents make decisions about their childrens education
34.The authors opinion of child adoption seems to be that .
A)no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B) white families should adopt black children
C) adoption should be based on IQ test results
D) cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
35.Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that .
A)good will may sometimes complicate racial problems
B)social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children
C)intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas
D)American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues
参考答案
31.B 32.C 33.D 34.A 35.D
欧盟:年假期间生病可补休
英男子脚踩两只船 生下12个娃没露馅
挥别这些习惯才能高效率
全球制造基地可能转移
睡眠达人不告诉你的三个秘密
英国最小企业家:6岁女孩开3家糖果店
微软传言可能推出平板电脑
父女约定 A promise kept
彩票大奖得主亲述:我中大奖后的人生
三分之二亚洲人实际上自认更富有
马斯克的胶囊高铁要来中国
成功人士都有的11个好习惯
金玉良言:三位创业大师的创业建议
睡不着又睡不好?19招教你迅速入睡
标点符号暗藏的性格秘密
美国人亚洲择邻居 只为孩子学中文
艾玛开了个求助热线,帮助职场女性免受骚扰
澳父亲50箱啤酒换儿子一份工作
端午节传统风俗(双语版)
他们在生命的岔路口相遇
英国9岁小女孩吐槽学校午餐走红
调查:美国婴儿潮一代将不留遗产
纪念计算机科学之父艾伦•图灵100周年诞辰
长寿金鱼存活24年 四岁小男孩如今已28
2020年全球大学毕业生或短缺?
男性喝茶过多易患癌症
20条最离谱的辞职理由
夏季出国旅行需注意什么?
全球十大美女城市揭晓 亚洲仅首尔入选
体育到商场?从体育赛场看商场竞争
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |