The Guidford Four, freed last week after spending 15 years in prison for crimes they did not commit, would almost certainly have been executed for the pub bombing they were convicted of. They had the death penalty been in force at the time of their trial. They may now be a decent interval before the pro-hanging lobby, which has the support of the Prime Minister, makes another attempt to reintroduce the noose.
Reflections along these lines were about the only kind of consolation to be derived from this gross miscarriage of justice which is now to be the subject of a judicia l inquiry. In the meantime, defense lawyers are demanding compensation and have in mind about half a million pounds for each of their clients.
The first three to be released-Mr. Gerald Conlon, Mr. Paddy Armstrong and Ms. Carole Richardson-left prison with the 34 pounds which is given to all departing inmates. The fourth, Mr. Paul Hill, was not released immediately but taken to Belfast, where he lodged an appeal against his conviction for the murder of a former British soldier. Since this conviction, too, was based on the now discredited statements allegedly made to the Survey police, he was immediately let out on bail. But he left empty-handed.
The immediate reaction to the scandal was renewed demand for the re-examination of the case against the Birmingham Six, who are serving life sentences for pub bombings in that city. Thus far the Home secretary, Mr. Douglas Hurd, is insisting that the two cases are not comparable; that what is now known about the Guilford investigation has no relevance to what happened in Birmingham.
Mr. Hurd is right to the extent that there was a small-though flimsy and hotly-contested-amount of crime evidence in the Birmingham case. The disturbing similarity is that the Birmingham Six, like the Guilford Four, claim that police officers lied and fabricated evidence to secure a conviction.
Making scapegoats of a few rogue police officers will not be sufficient to eliminate the Guilford miscarriage of justice. These are already demands that the law should be changed; first to make it impossible to convict on confessions alone; and secondly to require that statements from accused persons should only be taken in the presence of an independent third patty to ensure they are not made under punishment.
It was also being noted this week that the Guilford Four owe their release more to be persistence of investigative reporters than to the diligence of either the judiciary or the police. Yet investigative reports-particularly on television-have recently been a particular target for the condemnation of Mrs. Thatcher and some of her ministers who seem to think that TV should be muzzled in the public interest and left to get on with soap operas and quiz shows.
1. The word noose has the closest meaning to ________.
A. death penalty B. hanging
C. trial D.punishment
2. To compensate the miscarriage of justice, the defense lawyers may_________.
A. demand 500,000 pounds for the Guilford Four
B. demand 500,000 pounds for each of the Guilford Four
C. demand 1,000,000 pounds for each of the Guilford Four
D. demand a re-examination of the Birmingham pub bombings
3. Why was there a renewed demand for the re-examination of the case against the Birmingham Six?
A. The Birmingham Six were believed to have criminal connections with the Guilford Four.
B. The two cases were similar in that both were about pub bombings.
C. The bombings in Birmingham happened at the same time.
D. The Birmingham Six also claimed that there were police malpractices in their case.
4. The existing law states that________.
A. convictions can be made on confessions and statements taken by police officers from accused persons are valid legal evidence
B. convictions cant be made on confessions alone and there should be a third party when taking statements from accused persons
C. convictions can be made on confessions and a third party should be present when taking statements from accused persons
D. convictions cant be made on confessions alone and the statements taken by police officers from accused persons are valid legal evidence
5. According to the article, which of the following parties contributed most to the release of the Guilford Four?
A. Reporters B. Lawyers
C. The police D. The judiciary
1.B 猜测词义题。在此意思是绞刑。
2. B 细节题。在文中第二段的最后一句中可以得到正确答案。
3. D 事实细节题。在文中第五段最后一句中提到police officers a conviction.因此D项为正确选项。
4. A 细节引申题。从文中第五,六段可以知道A项为正确选项。
5. A 细节理解题。从文中的最后一段第一句It was alsoor the police.可以看出A项为正确选项。
英语听力中要注意九大类标志词
怎样驾驭四六级听力
大学英语四六级考试对话式听力题型的分析
支招四六级考生听力是个基本功
四六级听力段落理解题的解构
提高四六级英语听力七大法宝
备考六月英语四六级听力题型分析和对策
英语四六级听力对话部分秘诀保你8分拿7分
搞定四六级听力两个重要环节词汇和语流
以音义结合突破语音关而提高听力
2013年6月大学英语四六级听力应对策略
如何克服英语四六级听力提高五大障碍
新东方考前辅导的串讲讲义
提高听力七个网上美语电台及收听方法指导
复习指南应对大学英语四六级听力的题量变化
大学英语四六级考试听力备考的建议
必看大学英语四六级考试听力的备考建议
四六级听力中不再只有美音
四六级考试夯实听力的基本功
复合式听写难度且未必增加
CET英语听力突破六大方法
新东方英语900句文本和录音开口篇01
完美听力打造法经典电影搭配的完美练习
英语四六级听力最常见的4种提问方式
三大要诀应对大学英语的四六级听力
12月大学英语四六级考试听力高分必备两大招
听力第二部分考选择题的可能性大4
英语四六级听力的关键点突破惯用语
英语四六级短文听力训练应忌四大误区
四六级英语考试变化大听力是场硬战
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |