Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:1-5 AABDB
长江中游“城市群”规划获批
“假离婚”夫妇迎来复婚潮
“薪酬改革”将出配套政策
环境污染责任险
支付宝“十年账单”
“个人游”、“一签多行”将优化调整
博鳌亚洲论坛十大关键词[1]
中美将深化“智慧城市”双边合作
《政府工作报告》首推图解本
湄公河“联合巡逻执法”启动
家庭影院频道
机关事业单位“职业年金”办法发布
中国探索本土化“绿色建筑”道路
IT大佬两会提议“智慧民生”
“探月工程”将向民资开放
党报批部分干部“逆商”偏低
万众一心开创“四个全面”新局面
“卢布贬值”连累中国天气预报
A股“一人一户”全面解禁
各地掀起“自贸区热”
习近平:保护“生态”如护眼睛
适时启动“深港通”试点
中国回应奥巴马批“反恐法”
八部委整顿“网络售彩”
今年将推进“反腐败立法”
上海拟建悬挂式“空中列车”
“证券法”修订草案年内或出台
中国“零售银行”规模将持续激增
“足改方案”出台
“事实孤儿”急需国家救助
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |