Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:1-5 AABDB
雅思阅读备考笔记:复习计划
如何提升雅思阅读成绩?
雅思阅读训练方法:扫读
雅思阅读文章中的基本信号词
雅思阅读材料:Forests sell-off end
雅思阅读真题练习:The Rollfilm Revolution
雅思阅读T/F/NG题型例题解析
雅思阅读高分答题技巧:了解文章结构
雅思阅读真题材料:Agriculture and tourism
雅思阅读备考笔记:电影学习推荐
6种雅思阅读文章的段落结构
雅思阅读T/F/NG题型实战练习
雅思阅读备考的四个实用原则
雅思阅读材料:Hosni Mubarak resigns
突破雅思阅读的五大备考步骤
雅思阅读考试最重要的2个考点
雅思阅读模拟题:The Spectacular Eruption of Mount St. Helens
雅思阅读材料:Unemployment raise in UK
雅思阅读备考笔记:T/F/NG题解答方法
雅思阅读答题高分技巧介绍
雅思阅读模拟题:Geophysics For Utility Location
如何充分使用雅思阅读真题?
雅思阅读高分的三个窍门:提速是关键
雅思阅读水平的自测方法
雅思阅读模拟题:People and Organisations: The Selection Issue
雅思阅读背景词汇:环境资源
雅思阅读全真模拟题:satisfactory education
雅思阅读四大题型的出题特点
雅思阅读材料:What make of Justin Bieber?
10句雅思阅读长难句结构分析
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |