Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
如何把GMAT作文的开头写好
GMAT作文模板之少数与多数
GMAT写作全方位解析—基础篇
GMAT作文提高技巧:补充句型
如何提高GMAT作文的打字速度
GMAT作文高分秘籍
GMAT作文的论据的设计与构造
也谈GMAT作文备考心得
积累和反复练习 GMAT作文备考的不二法则
GMAT作文策略详解(二)
打造思路清晰的GMAT作文
轻松掌握GMAT作文写作技巧
最新GMAT作文模板推荐
GMAT作文备考策略解析
5.5分牛人自述如何备考GMAT作文
把握要点 让GMAT写作备考妥妥的(一)
也谈GMAT写作速度的提高方法
GMAT写作实用提升技巧
GMAT写作提升守则:低级词替换(三)
GMAT作文考试中43个常见话题小结
GMAT写作短题目的解题技巧
GMAT作文满分之路
盘点GMAT作文易犯错误
最新GMAT作文题目整理(一)
GMAT作文高分策略解析(二)
GMAT写作全方位解析—语言篇
应对GMAT写作的三个要点
5.5分的胜利 GMAT写作备考经验分享
GMAT写作提升技巧:善用小词
GMAT作文提高技巧:类比使用心得
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |