Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
前台心里苦:盘点住店旅客奇葩问题TOP10
负能量爆棚?5个小动作轻松来搞定
13星座是什么鬼!新加的蛇夫座什么来头?!
最适合练口语的5部脱口秀
穿衣露肉已经out啦!含蓄穿搭更显性感!
功夫熊猫3背后的故事,你知道嘛?
如何用一个密码管理所有的密码
老外说:单词这样背1分钟牢记1个!
如何用形状来推测你的容忍度
最鼓舞人心的名言
让你每天精力充沛的十大方法
这小哥自拍有毒!镜头里有比他更抢镜的……
为什么大家都喜欢边走边玩手机?
脸书CEO携妻女拜年:中文比老婆还棒!
万万没想到:英语里表达情绪的词竟然这么少
听说常化妆的人才懂这19个词汇 你get了么
我是自带杀气的猫 愚蠢的人类不准靠近我!
苹果手机销量首次下滑
中国人和美国人之间的误解
Apple Pay登陆中国了 微信支付宝有对手了!
中国人赴日抢购纸尿裤
为何我再也无法在周末睡懒觉?
4岁!他却已经游历1万7千英里 走遍41个国家
瑞士每周又要白发4千块!土豪国你还缺人吗
不变的春节 渐变的年俗
你先看到鸭子还是兔?一张图测试大脑转速
压力山大怎么办?你要这么想就对了
这只汪乱入马拉松就算了 居然还拿了名次!
过年最怕亲戚问这10个问题 中招了么
练摊小贩变国际名模 逆袭就在一瞬间
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |