About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit in California claiming that the states ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a childs physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any childs intellectual level, the better for the child in question.
31. Why did the intelligence test become unpopular in the past few decades?
A) Its validity was challenged by many communities.
B) It was considered discriminative against minority children.
C) It met with strong opposition from the majority of black parents.
D) It deprived the black children of their rights to a good education.
32. The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to .
A) draw public attention to IQ testing
B) put an end to special education
C) remove the states ban on intelligence tests
D) have their children enter white schools
33. The author believes that intelligence testing .
A) may ease racial confrontation in the United States
B) can encourage black children to keep up with white children
C) may seriously aggravate racial discrimination in the United States
D) can help black parents make decisions about their childrens education
34. The authors opinion of child adoption seems to be that .
A) no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B) white families should adopt black children
C) adoption should be based on IQ test results
D) cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
35. Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that .
A) good will may sometimes complicate racial problems
B) social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children
C) intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas
D) American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues
31.B 32.C 33.D 34.A 35.D
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:读者的品味
2015中考英语备考:阅读有诀窍多读多听找语感
2015中考英语完型填空解题7个技巧
中考英语单项复习:中考英语阅读各个击破
初中生必读:初中英语书面表达学习经验分享
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:情绪
中考英语阅读理解每日一练(四)
中考英语完型答题技巧
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:金属
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:今日英国
初中英语阅读强化宝典:训练阅读速度
初中英语阅读强化宝典:改进阅读方式
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:生命中最重要的
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:小狗
2014中考英语完形填空及答案:干旱
冲刺北京中考英语阅读与表达的解题思路
2014中考英语完形填空及答案:同学间冲突
中考英语阅读理解不要烦 有绝招
2014中考英语完形填空及答案:小孩的礼物
中考英语阅读理解每日一练(三)
2014中考英语完形填空及答案:海边的故事
中考英语阅读理解解题方法与技巧
2014年中考英语阅读理解及答案精选
中考英语阅读理解 得分宝典经验谈
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:吉姆的烦恼
2014中考英语完形填空及答案:水资源
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:关于手机
2014中考英语完形填空及答案100篇精选
中考英语阅读理解每日一练(八)
2014中考英语阅读理解及答案:计划生育
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |