You dont have to look very far to find out why the official reactions to medical findings have been so lukewarm. The answer is simply money. Tobacco is a wonderful commodity to tax. Its almost like a tax on our daily bread. In tax revenue alone, the government of Britain collects enough from smokers to pay for its entire educational facilities. So while the authorities point out ever so discreetly that smoking may, conceivable, be harmful, it doesnt do to shout too loudly about it.
This is surely the most short-sighted policy you could imagine. While money is eagerly collected in vast sums with one hand, it is paid out in increasingly vaster sums with the other. Enormous amounts are spent on cancer research and on efforts to cure people suffering from the disease. Countless valuable lives are lost. In the long run, there is no doubt that everybody would be much better-off if smoking were banned altogether.
Of course, we are not ready for such a drastic action. But if the governments of the world were honestly concerned about the welfare of their peoples, youd think theyd conduct aggressive anti-smoking campaigns. Far from it! The tobacco industry is allowed to spend staggering sums on advertising. Its advertising is as insidious as it is dishonest. We are never shown pictures of real smokers coughing up their lungs early in the morning. That would never do. The advertisement always depict virile, clean-shaven young men. They suggest it is manly to smoke, even positively healthy! Smoking is associated with the great open-air life, with beautiful girls, true love and togetherness. What utter nonsense!
For a start, governments could begin by banning all cigarette and tobacco advertising and should then conduct anti-smoking advertising campaigns of their own. Smoking should be banned in all public places like theatres, cinemas and restaurants. Great efforts should be made to inform young people especially of the dire consequences of taking up the habit. A horrific warning say, a picture of a deaths head should be included in every packet of cigarettes that is sold. As individuals, we are certainly weak, but if governments acted honestly and courageously, they could protect us from ourselves.
1. Why do a few governments take timid measures toward smoking?
[A] because they are afraid of people.
[B] Because diseases cost a lot.
[C] Because they are afraid of the cutting down of their revenue.
[D] Because they are afraid of manufacturers.
2. The tone of this passage is
[A] critical.
[B] ironical.
[C] distaste.
[D] amusing.
3. What does the sentence because you are in good company mean?
[A] you are backed by the government.
[B] You are not alone.
[C] You have good colleagues.
[D] Governments are blind to evils of smoking too.
4. What is the best title of this passage?
[A] World Governments should conduct serious campaigns against smoking.
[B] World governments take timid measures against smoking.
[C] smoking is the most important source of income to many countries.
[D] tobacco industry spends a large sum of money on medical research.
囧研究:爱Shopping?23分钟后变购物狂
办公室显规则:10个职场恶习招人嫌
英国夫妇真人版史莱克婚礼:为癌筹款
鲍卡斯接任美国驻华大使三大后果
人们最想知道的商界大佬的小秘密
美教授评最佳CEO 腾讯小马哥强势入围
盘点那些不靠谱的简历写作技巧
微博辣妈大赛引争议 安能辨我是母女?
同事变恋人:办公室恋情怎么处理
美国男子花百元抽奖赢毕加索画作 价值百万
中国燃煤的排放量导致“25万人过早死亡”
若离开阿里巴巴 雅虎价值几何
玛莎百货将使用中性玩具包装
瑞士将公投全民发工资 每人每月1.7万
巴西拒绝斯诺登避难请求 称无意对抗美国
职场囧研究:喝大杯拿铁更容易成功
埃及警察总部爆炸 官方认定为恐怖袭击
珍爱生活远离干扰:浪费生命的9件事
中国移动与苹果终合作 移动版iPhone明年开卖
俄罗斯国家杜马通过大赦令 影响2万多人
生活教会我们成长的10种方式
社交必学:工作聚会中万能谈话话题
英女王私人庄园不够住 王室成员佣人房里过圣诞
新年健康吃:远离节日病的四条妙招
在路上:做旅行者很棒的18个理由
肥胖引发肝硬化“浪潮”
没时间?如何让老板帮你减少工作量
在工作上做出牺牲的母亲幸福感更强
年底考评不用怕:高绩效的6个秘密
哈佛学生:不想期末考 谎称学校有炸弹
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |