Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
澳洲妈妈脸书晒娃遭朋友吐槽
女性为何喜欢第六张自拍
澳8岁女孩网上教烹饪 月入79万
盘点那些年被改编成电影的名著
《疯狂外星人》来袭:谢耳朵变身外星怪咖
各国人最爱的表情符号
各种奇葩英文版辞职信:世界那么大 我想去看看
年轻时最需学会的5项技能
惊呆!买包薯片发现里面装个土豆
希拉里“购置”2百多万推特粉丝
世界读书日:硅谷CEO们都在读什么
每小时100颗 天琴座流星雨今晚降临
2015年度普利策奖揭晓
百度搜索退出日本揭秘 最大对手并非谷歌
世界那么大,你应该去看看
膜拜 捐款600亿美元的四位慈善大亨
清晨的21句正能量自我暗示
美国男子开8枪“杀电脑”
机器人厨师诞生了!
激萌身高差 巴西2.3米巨人娶1.5米娇妻
王室宝贝:你不知道的五件事
10个与饮食问题有关的词汇
中国女性更喜欢独自旅行
白宫启用中性厕所
二氧化碳变燃油 奥迪黑科技研发成功
英国人享受“美好”的50件事
冰淇淋狂欢节:各种神奇口味英文怎么说?
英国开首家狗狗“游击餐厅”
孔雀把汽车投影当情敌 狠啄车身
从IBM到苹果 一张图看懂科技巨头盛衰史
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |