Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
莫言的诺贝尔领奖服:风格跨越东西方
中国文化曾影响世界,未来也同样可以
国内英语资讯:Xi visits cultural heritage site in Gansu
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier stresses stabilizing employment
《生活大爆炸》穿衣经之女人的衣橱
人之将死,其言也善:生命终结时五大遗憾
职业性格测试 你了解几分?
澳女生带手雷进课堂展示讲解 学校紧急疏散
普京命令官员申报个人消费 超出收入部分充公
蹭课文化风靡校园
对中国的雇主来说 求职者“外表”很重要
男性插足女性行业,一切理所当然
姚明给中国篮球开药方
美公司研发新技术可让面包保质60天
颠覆你的认知:水果并不是越多吃越好
被观众嫌胖 美国女主播公开强势回应
贝克汉姆完美告别美国大联盟 携三子温情谢幕
培养女孩为富翁的保镖
细数当下小幸福:三个方法重拾对生活的热情
日本公司推出3D胎儿模型
悉尼将斥巨资建中国主题公园 造紫禁城门
朋友一生一起走:五种方式这样经营友情
《好汉两个半》演员称该剧“污秽”后道歉
中国未来的顶级模特从T台转向网络
研究:老板更爱雇佣自己喜欢的员工
印尼真人版少年派 男子与孟加拉虎亲密相伴
瑞士获评2013年最佳出生地
《一九四二》:冯小刚的成与败
中东男子热衷胡须移植
“末日”预言逼近 英国人储食备避孕套
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |