Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
社会大课堂:社交达人的7个秘密
4个小技巧让你的任务清单更完美
德美关系:监听默克尔
查尔斯王子担心成为“王座的囚犯”
传统教育改革?翻转课堂是大势!
不留遗憾:人们离世时最后悔的20件事
德媒:美国监听默克尔电话超10年
剪去长发!女模特华丽变身帅气男模
荷兰艺术家:真空吸尘器净化北京空气
别有一番滋味在心头 读懂大学生心中的乡愁
The origin of Chinese Tourists Image 中国游客形象的缘由
默多克卖掉凤凰卫视 全面撤出中国?
法院判贝卢斯科尼每月支付前妻140万欧元
美国校园枪击案1死2伤 凶手自杀身亡
NASA太空卫星图上的神秘光点系渔船
研究表明睡眠清除大脑垃圾
通宵熬夜会让你的身体发生这些……
美国被爆曾监听35个外国领导人
吉米就“杀光中国人”言论道歉
军演引发澳大利亚大规模山火
长假归来无心工作学习?这些良方请收下!
就业相亲增强自信 中国兴起男性整容热
爱发短信?你该放下手机的7个理由
BBC被指诽谤哈里王子吸毒
9周大婴儿成为英国最小选美冠军
10大原因告诉你 你其实很有魅力!
我们都青春过:年轻时会犯的5个错
纳粹大屠杀幸存者和马友友演奏昔日狱友歌曲
最强DIY:建筑师自制邮票免费寄信
解析大荧幕:如何让出轨变得合理?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |