Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
希望考生能够认认真真准备,争取能够顺利通过考试。
360度全方位了解习大大的神奇APP
看完这个,你也能设计出绝妙英语广告语
婚前五大必问问题,你接招了吗?
福音!运动后可以吃快餐
可以帮你过滤粗话的app
囧研究:你知道放什么音乐吃嘛嘛香吗?
10个可替换的人体器官
刘翔职业生涯十大瞬间
爆笑!主人犯罪被捕 狗狗主动投降
法严打“极瘦主义”网站
咱中国人干过哪些很中国的事儿?
监拍 商场路人会对巧克力卷福雕像做神马?
幸福婚姻秘诀:双份家私
10条助你达到内心平和的建议
巴黎计划成为“世界自行车之都”
文莱王子超奢华大婚:新浪珠宝满身
5分钟的血月 本世纪最短月全食周六到来
为什么人在26岁时朋友最多?
我们为什么害怕死亡?
德公司诚聘妓女测评师 真的
你看到爱因斯坦还是梦露?
肥胖歧视受法律管制 嘲弄者将被重罚
社交礼节知多少 你会和加拿大人打招呼吗
外国人眼中5个最美英文单词
笑声或能开启一段新关系
希拉里正式宣布参选 美国或迎首位女总统
在信任缺失的中国医院切身体验看病难
海尔便携洗衣机比酒杯还小
名字会悄悄影响你的行为
猫是上楼还是下楼?答案揭晓
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |