Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
希望考生能够认认真真准备,争取能够顺利通过考试。
重磅推荐:2010年雅思写作真题总结与展望
雅思写作标准:千万别用中文思维
雅思口语偏方:在发牢骚中学英语
名师指点雅思听力:不得不说的秘密
考生必读:雅思口语考试四大常见误区
雅思阅读高分必知的十大出题原则
加油站:教你练习雅思口语的十个建议
复习指南:提高雅思阅读速度的三点建议
不可不看:决胜雅思考试的6个黄金习惯
决定雅思成败的三个语音语调问题
高中生学雅思要重视细节积累
加油站:短期突破雅思词汇需注意的三个方面
2010年雅思考试写作高中考生犯错列表
雅思阅读加分法宝:快速阅读
加油站:2010年10月9
雅思专项指导:如何展开大作文主体段
重磅推荐:如何避开雅思听力考试8大陷阱
考官提示:最易忽视的2个雅思口试流程
复习指南:6大个性化答题法决战雅思口语
名师点金:雅思写作中代词使用点拨
雅思口语秘籍:六招让你赚足“印象分”
不可不看:浅谈雅思写作中的词汇表达
雅思口语宝典:考试流程里的秘密
加油站:获取雅思听力高分的四大步骤
遣词造句没问题 写作考生结构和举例最弱
雅思名师:提升三大能力成就高分口语
加油站:听说读写深入解读雅思口语
中国考生最常犯的6个雅思口语错误
为什么中国学生雅思口语成绩全球倒数第一
雅思听力考试原则:你记住了吗?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |