Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
希望考生能够认认真真准备,争取能够顺利通过考试。
职场英语学习:扭转等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:我不要跟你吃工作午餐
职场英语学习:接打电话的礼仪和态度
职场英语学习:提心吊胆的等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:消费者基金会等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:如何下订单
职场英语学习:know-how本事技术的口语表达
职场英语学习:上班族等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:How old are they?询问同事兄弟姐妹的年龄
职场英语学习:正式电子邮件常用语
职场英语学习:别慌---请求帮助用语
职场英语学习:博物馆、美术馆等方面词的口语表达
职场英语学习:What do they do? 介绍家人的职业
职场英语学习:和同事在餐馆点餐时的英语口语对话
职场英语学习:Do you have andy brothers or sisters?有兄弟姐妹吗
职场英语学习:生物科技等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:介绍新老板
职场英语学习:千载难逢的机会的口语表达
职场英语学习:能力还比不过资历,我可能会丢了饭碗
职场英语学习:向朋友或同事介绍自己的家庭
职场英语学习:领导品牌等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:Disagrering不赞同同事的意见
职场英语学习:抱怨加班
职场英语学习:用英语表达有关发布指示-商量今后的事上
职场英语学习:老牌等词的口语表达
职场英语学习:Asking and giving opinions询问及给出建议
职场英语学习:值得w职场英语学习:orth/deserving口语表达
职场英语学习:介绍新同事
职场英语学习:What do you think?询问他人对当今电视节目的看法
职场英语学习:专家specialist的口语表达
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |