Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
希望考生能够认认真真准备,争取能够顺利通过考试。
读心术:一个眼神就出卖了你内心的秘密
太阳黑子消失 地球或迎小冰期
红色和黄色的墙纸跟学习更配哦
日本招聘出新招 打麻将代替面试
网评不做键盘侠,12个问题先自答
脱欧后 要和英国洽谈合作的国家已排起了长队
逃避现实者的9个特征 你中枪了么?
眼睛疲劳不用烦,8个方法助舒缓
男人心海底针:男人真正想说的是什么?
我曾是一个不友好的人
同性恋彩虹旗的历史与来历
玩大了!英国脱欧 英语或被踢出欧盟官方语言
如果你发现自己在事业中有畏难情绪
喝水不够对身体造成的不良后果
近万人参加的反脱欧游行:这些标语看笑了
开卷考依然一脸懵逼,窍门在这里!
BBC纪录片《Europe - Them or Us》英国欧盟的爱恨情仇
写作后不能忽略的事:快速查找错误
里约奥运会中国队服装曝光 又是番茄炒蛋?!
土耳其机场发生爆炸 36人死亡140多人受伤
增加压力的四种食物
英女王将加薪 八一八王室成员薪水
世界上最难学的10种语言 汉语排第一
国内英语资讯:Experts say Xis speech at awards ceremony to inspire Chinese people, international friends
印度24元智能机将发售 太像iphone外媒都笑了
为什么我是单身狗?
一天之计在于晨:三件小事让你做个晨型人
纽约街头现假和尚乞讨
你每天应该吃芒果的4个理由
任天堂的Switch Lite正式发布
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |