Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1.This passage implies that war is now ___.
A.worse than in the past.
B.as bad as in the past
C.not so dangerous as in the past
D.as necessary as in the past
2.In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A.abolish war
B.improve weapons
C.solve international problems
D.live a peaceful life
3.From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A.is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B.does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C.believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D.does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4.According to the author, ___.
A.war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B.war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C.it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D.war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5.The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A.international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B.man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C.nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D.world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
希望考生能够认认真真准备,争取能够顺利通过考试。
GRE写作范文——Icebergs
GRE写作范文——Children’s numerical skills
GRE考试逻辑问题分析论证句式(二)
GRE写作范文——Botany
GRE写作范文——Collectibles
GRE写作范文——Suburbanization
新GRE写作需注意的八个必须
GRE写作范文——Raising Oysters
GRE写作范文——Televisions
GRE写作范文——International Business and Cross-cultural Communication
GRE写作之是非问题分析论证句式(五)
GRE考试逻辑问题分析论证句式(一)
GRE写作范文——A Rare Fossil Record
GRE写作范文——Scientific Theories
GRE作文考试入门和进阶提高攻略(9)
GRE写作范文——Andrew Carnegie
GRE写作句子表达是关键
GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(19)
GRE作文考试入门和进阶提高攻略(7)
GRE作文怎样写才地道
如何提高GRE写作:11种修辞方法应用
GRE考试应考策略:多做练习是关键
GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(4)
GRE考试Issue写作范文详解(15)
GRE写作范文——The source of Energy
GRE写作范文——The Nobel Academy
GRE写作范文——Cohesion-tension Theory
GRE写作之是非问题分析论证句式(二)
GRE写作范文——Skyscrapers and Environment
GRE写作范文——The Definition of “Price”
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |