Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
2017欧盟对漫游费用说拜拜
Uber继续在印度大举扩张
你敢走吗?世界最长最高玻璃桥亮相中国
日本解除“夜舞禁令”
英国为何应圈护零售银行业
股市暴跌后 中国再次降息降准
白金汉宫翻修耗资1.5亿英镑,英女王或搬家
降息能否推高中国股市 How have Chinese investors responded to rate cuts
来一瓶“希腊退欧”酒可好?
中国购物中心建设方兴未艾
中国央行降息意在安抚股市与市场
美国大数据公司联手京东做信用评估
债务危机中的希腊旅游攻略
裸奔派VS西装派:看英国人如何吐槽37度高温
度完假回来失忆了?
李克强敦促欧盟与中国达成双边投资协定
中美减排计划令人期待全球协议
各大经济体应该警惕"低利率世界"的风险
就业难?淘宝“卖”毕业生,1000元可拍!
希腊关闭银行并实行资本管制
优步将收购部分微软地图技术
夏天必备!全球最棒的10家冰淇淋店!
粉丝打造“乔治王子”仿真娃娃
关于希腊债务危机你必须要了解的六个问题
法国禁止开车时进食看地图
今夏台湾流行吃西瓜面包
李克强中欧工商峰会演讲(双语)
米其林餐厅助推周边房产繁荣
美国古巴就互设使馆达成协议
美国白宫:欢迎大家来拍照!
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |