Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
G类雅思投诉信写作思路整理
雅思写作范文:Sport Event
雅思写作范文精选:新建筑是否应延续传统风格
雅思大作文写作黄金六法则
雅思大作文审题偏差的原因及对策
雅思大作文范文:互联网
雅思写作最佳组合练习题
雅思大作文范文:Food From Far Away
浅谈雅思写作+雅思作文练习
雅思大作文经典题目(9)
雅思大作文范文:权利和平等
雅思大作文范文:解决能源危机
雅思大作文范文:离婚率
10条雅思作文检查方法分享
雅思大作文经典题目(1)
雅思大作文经典题目(5)
轻人的行为
雅思大作文范文:职业运动员
雅思写作中的中式思维与英式思维
雅思大作文范文:罪犯的处置
雅思大作文经典题目(6)
雅思大作文范文:富国人民为什么不快乐
雅思大作文经典题目(7)
浅析雅思议论文的论证方法
雅思大作文范文:改善环境质量
2月4日雅思写作真题及范文
剖析雅思官方范文 挖掘写作考官心理
雅思大作文范文:Family History
雅思大作文范文:建筑物
何钢:雅思写作流程图真题讲解及方法解析
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |