Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
参考答案:
1-5 AABDB
学以致用:怎样更好的和外国人交谈?
零起点教学有助于遏制教育“抢跑”
家长必知:如何营造家庭英语环境
上海总结“零起点” 35所学校亮招数
临近开学孩子准备好了?别把好习惯丢幼儿园
双榆树中心小学 “北京云南手拉手”
父母需知:给孩子讲故事有益成长
北京教改:学校间构建深度联盟致择校热降温
孩子学英语的8个最佳途径分享
黄磊写给女儿多多:写给未来的你
“组合拳”破解择校难住不住学区房都可能进名校
家长必读:科学暑假计划分享
2014年东城区幼升小入学顺序
幼升小:入学、户籍、孩子、房子!
专家指导:亲子阅读三步曲集锦
假期接近尾声,幼升小的必修课
北京市23所高校签署协议参与中小学薄弱校办学
上不上培训班 孩子无力否决 大人也很纠结
幼升小毕业典礼两6岁男孩拥抱大哭
北京未报上名儿童获邻校预留学位
专家解读:城乡和谐教育均衡发展需要快落实
北京大兴区开办两所全日制公办小学
专家解读:非京籍上学难真是因为学生太多吗?
2015幼升小:北京大兴区新增两所全日制公办小学
家长和孩子共同做到“无缝衔接”
幼升小孩子习惯培养:预习教材不如叫他收拾书包
义务教育阶段体育课时普涨 小学初中增加体育课
北京教育改革破解择校难 不住学区房也能进名校
孩子暑期要过好,家长先备课
北京民办中小学靠"特色"博生源
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |