Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
阿姆斯特丹将建“人渣村” 行为不当者被集中监控
无需插入耳孔的耳机
美国康州小学枪击案 三名教师为救学生身亡
国内英语资讯:Xi sends congratulatory letter to first National Park Forum
生活这样过:励志人生的10大关键词
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier stresses stabilizing employment
全球最宜居城市 维也纳蝉联榜首
Chinese Actress Will Play Mulan 中国女演员扮演花木兰
过来人分享:20多岁要养成的20个好习惯(二)
喝牛奶伤身?
研究:圣诞音乐刺激购物欲望
朋友一生一起走:五种方式这样经营友情
平板电脑等设备或实现用眼睛操控
以德报怨,枪击案遇难者父亲向枪手家庭致哀
国际英语资讯:UN commemorates fallen colleagues in 2003 Baghdad attack
研究发现:女人更爱偷瞄女人
国际英语资讯:Germany reaffirms support to two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
英女王为美国校园枪击案表示震惊和哀痛
美摄影师拍地铁撞人照片 被批见死不救
你的大学是不是必需?
女人的潜台词:揭秘女性常用的5句口头禅
美枪击惨案凶手父亲:我们至今还难以置信
国际英语资讯:17 injured as series of blasts rock Afghan eastern Jalalabad city
赵本山将参加今年春晚
蹭课文化风靡校园
男性插足女性行业,一切理所当然
澳女生带手雷进课堂展示讲解 学校紧急疏散
悉尼将斥巨资建中国主题公园 造紫禁城门
乔丹发布令人费解的新鞋
印尼真人版少年派 男子与孟加拉虎亲密相伴
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |