Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
提升自信流利说英语新招:演戏剧!
小心!10个词语分分钟暴露你不自信
中国如何让资本外流变成好事
怎样让他更爱你?6句话 让他对你死心塌地
企业家成功的5大要素 乔布斯全都有
你想过吗?小熊维尼的名字里为啥没Bear?
桌面乱?也许天才就是你!
睡觉裸裸更健康,四大好处见真章
最新瘦标准来袭,揭晓为啥苗条塑造美
背上背包去旅行:旅行的6堂人生课
大众在中国召回1950部柴油车
NASA:其实我们没有发现水......
什么运动最有利于降血压?
找个不懂你的人?不如做只单身狗
中国亿万富翁人数首超美国!王健林再成首富
体坛英语资讯:China ranked 13th in FIBA World Cup power rankings
要想睡眠好,睡前不做这6件事
重读童话:再也不是小时候的那个单纯世界
国内英语资讯:15,000 military personnel to partake in National Day parade
“雪糕香蕉”带你进入香蕉的奇妙世界
幸福难 解释幸福更难
不能说的秘密!亚述尔群岛的神秘桃源
澳洲干旱 蟒蛇钻进马桶寻水
6招足不出户轻松赚钱大法
大叔爱萝莉?看看男人对此如何解释
辟谣!众生对喝酒的五大误解
男性会对自己工作量撒谎
带你了解文胸500年演变史
减肥有新招:换个小盘子吃饭
对号入座:你的老师是什么类型的?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |