Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
新加坡国父李光耀去世 享年91岁
25个最常弄错含义的单词(2)
德国载150人客机在法坠毁 无人生还
为什么7700是飞行员最讨厌的数字?
美经济伦理学网络公开课受追捧
唐顿庄园太火 中国富豪急求英式管家
聊聊弹幕那些事儿
出去走走:7大理由旅行让你更健康
23个实用的旅行小贴士
牛仔裤的潮流穿法:搭配是王道
高收入人群爱豪饮?
德翼客机坠机之谜 一飞行员被锁舱外
语言学学士教你背单词
永远的多啦A梦
德翼空难 飞行员蓄意坠机事件盘点
世界很奇妙 11个你也许不知道的事实
上班以后重拾英语 这些经验你需要知道
英国重葬理查三世 远亲卷福现场读诗
愚人节恶作剧 这样才给力!
陈光标承认造假: 用温水参加冰桶挑战
舌尖上的美国之快餐文化:肯德基爷爷落榜
投简历有窍门: 你真的用对了邮箱吗?
横跨欧亚大陆计划:将建世界最长高速公路
世界上最美丽的英文单词是哪个?
扑克猜心术
外国网友: 重庆何以琛交警太帅引围观 该!
苹果CEO蒂姆库克 计划“捐出全部财富”
吃货必备厨房用语
如何成为学霸?
无需对中国债务危机过度悲观
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |