Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(8)
SAT阅读的特点及应对策略
SAT阅读考试题型解析之weakenedstrengthened
SAT考试Grid-in练习题3
SAT阅读题目的做题方法
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(5)
如何深入理解SAT阅读的考试题目
SAT阅读完成句子习题(1)
SAT阅读长难句特点和分析方法介绍
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(3)
SAT阅读文章:A Chemist
SAT考试Grid-in练习题1
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(7)
SAT阅读考题全面讲解及答题要点
SAT阅读考试考场答题方法介绍
SAT阅读考试的特点与备考策略
SAT阅读完成句子习题(2)
SAT文章阅读高分切记两点原则
SAT阅读高分指南(2):Passage-based Reading讲解
SAT阅读高分指南(6):社科类阅读-4
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(3)
解答SAT填空题的四个切入点
SAT阅读高分指南(12):短篇阅读
SAT阅读技巧与备考方法介绍
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(10)
SAT阅读考试的三大误区
SAT阅读考试的特点和应对策略
SAT阅读填空题常考单词整理(11)
SAT阅读考试的答题技巧与题型分析
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(6)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |