Is it possible to persuade mankind to live without war? War is an ancient institution, which has existed for at least six thousand years. It was always bad and usually foolish, but in the past human race managed to live with it. Modern ingenuity has changed this. Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man. For the present, it is nuclear weapons that cause the most serious danger, but bacteriological or chemical weapons may, before long, offer an even greater threat. If we succeed in abolishing nuclear weapons, our work will not be done. It will never be done until we have succeeded in abolishing war. To do this, we need to persuade mankind to look upon international questions in a new way, not as contests of force, in which the victory goes to the side which is most skillful in killing people, but by arbitration in accordance with agreed principles of law. It is not easy to change very old mental habits, but this is what must be attempted.
There are those who say that the adoption of this or that ideology would prevent war. I believe this to be a big error. All ideologies are based upon dogmatic statements that are, at best, doubtful, and at worst, totally false. Their adherents believe in them so fanatically that they are willing to go to war in support of them.
The movement of world opinion during the past few years has been very largely such as we can welcome. It has become a commonplace that nuclear war must be avoided. Of course very difficult problems remain in the world, but the spirit in which they are being approached is a better one than it was some years ago. It has begun to be thought, even by the powerful men who decide whether we shall live or die, that negotiations should reach agreements even if both sides do not find these agreements wholly satisfactory. It has begun to be understood that the important conflict nowadays is not between different countries, but between man and the atom bomb.
1. This passage implies that war is now ___.
A. worse than in the past.
B. as bad as in the past
C. not so dangerous as in the past
D. as necessary as in the past
2. In the sentence To do this, we need to persuade mankind , this refers to ___.
A. abolish war
B. improve weapons
C. solve international problems
D. live a peaceful life
3. From Paragraph 2 we learn that the author of the passage ___.
A. is an adherent of some modern ideologies.
B. does not think that adoption of any ideology could prevent war.
C. believe that the adoption of some ideology could prevent war.
D. does not doubt the truth of any ideologies.
4. According to the author, ___.
A. war is the only way to solve international disputes.
B. war will be less dangerous because of the improvement of weapons.
C. it is impossible for the people to live without war.
D. war must be abolished if man wants to survive.
5. The last paragraph suggests that ___.
A. international agreements can be reached more easily now.
B. man begins to realize the danger of nuclear war.
C. nuclear war will definitely not take place.
D. world opinion welcomes nuclear war
答案:AABDB
雅思阅读9分心得:挑战自己
雅思阅读:专家指点备考的考试
雅思阅读技巧时代已结束 注重同义词积累
雅思阅读答题技巧:合理安排时间
如何快速提高雅思阅读成绩
雅思阅读:掌握英语同义词知识更为有力
雅思阅读如何应对乱序与同义转换
解决雅思阅读的两大杀招
雅思阅读部分出题四大趋势及备考策略
2011雅思考试提升阅读成绩技巧
雅思考生阅读考试主要问题解析
不要走进雅思阅读的误区
雅思阅读:词汇与技巧相结合
雅思阅读真题题源 :Music and the Mind
雅思阅读习惯:如何培养最佳阅读技巧
教你如何在雅思阅读中借鉴写作思路
雅思阅读备考:雅思G类阅读题型解析
掌握正确的雅思阅读方法才是关键
雅思考试切记不要盲目阅读文章
雅思战略:提高阅读速度
如何稳拿雅思阅读七分:加快速度控制时间
学术类雅思阅读难点与备考策略
王楠楠:雅思阅读中独立主格的构成类型和语法功
一季度雅思阅读出题分析
“慢工不出细活”走出雅思阅读误区
雅思阅读是否需要庞大的词汇量?
雅思阅读:正确选择中心词
雅思阅读:文章先?题目先?
雅思阅读中符号的解读
雅思阅读中“颜色”的不同含义
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |