It was a ruling that had consumers seething with anger and many a free trader crying foul. On November 20th the European Court of Justice decided that Tesco, a British supermarket chain, should not be allowed to import jeans made by America s Levi Strauss from outside the European Union and sell them at cut-rate prices without getting permission first from the jeans maker. Ironically, the ruling is based on an EU trademark directive that was designed to protect local, not American, manufacturers from price dumping. The idea is that any brand-owning firm should be allowed to position its goods and segment its markets as it sees fit: Levi s jeans, just like Gucci handbags, must be allowed to be expensive. Levi Strauss persuaded the court that, by selling its jeans cheaply alongside soap powder and bananas, Tesco was destroying the image and so the value of its brandswhich could only lead to less innovation and, in the long run, would reduce consumer choice. Consumer groups and Tesco say that Levi s case is specious. The supermarket argues that it was just arbitraging the price differential between Levi s jeans sold in America and Europea service performed a million times a day in financial markets, and one that has led to real benefits for consumers. Tesco has been selling some 15,000 pairs of Levi s jeans a week, for about half the price they command in specialist stores approved by Levi Strauss. Christine Cross, Tesco s head of global non-food sourcing, says the ruling risks creating a Fortress Europe with a vengeance。 The debate will rage on, and has implications well beyond casual clothes 。 The question at its heart is not whether brands need to control how they are sold to protect their image, but whether it is the job of the courts to help them do this. Gucci, an Italian clothes label whose image was being destroyed by loose licensing and over-exposure in discount stores, saved itself not by resorting to the courts but by ending contracts with third-party suppliers, controlling its distribution better and opening its own stores. It is now hard to find cut-price Gucci anywhere. Brand experts argue that Levi Strauss, which has been losing market share to hipper rivals such as Diesel, is no longer strong enough to command premium prices. Left to market forces, so-so brands such as Levi s might well fade away and be replaced by fresher labels. With the courts protecting its prices, Levi Strauss may hang on for longer. But no court can help to make it a great brand again. 1. Which of the following is not true according to Paragraph 1? [A]Consumers and free traders were very angry. [B]Only the Levis maker can decide the prices of the jeans. [C] The ruling has protected Levis from price dumping. [D] Levis jeans should be sold at a high price . 2. Guccis success shows that _______. [A]Gucci has successfully saved its own image. [B] It has changed its fate with its own effort. [C]Opening its own stores is the key to success. [D] It should be the courts duty to save its image. 3. The word specious in the context probably means _______. [A]responsible for oneself [B] having too many doubts [C] not as it seems to be [D]raising misunderstanding 4. According to the passage, the doomed fate of Levis is caused by such factors except that ________. [A]the rivals are competitive [B]it fails to command premium prices [C]market forces have their own rules [D]the court fails to give some help 5. The authors attitude towards Levis prospect seems to be _______. [A] biased [B] indifferent [C] puzzling [D] objective 答案:BBCDD
四级冲刺练习阅读(153)
四级快速阅读需注意的问题
四级冲刺练习阅读(137)
四级冲刺练习阅读(184)
四级冲刺点拨阅读做到三精读一略读
四级英语考试阅读指导(二)
四级听力短文理解的十大类标志词
四级英语考试阅读指导(一)
四级冲刺练习阅读(154)
四级冲刺练习阅读(162)
四级冲刺练习阅读(94)
大学英语四级考试阅读技巧
名师解读四级阅读备考的策略
征服四级阅读到底是读不懂读不快还是做不对
四级冲刺练习阅读(160)
四级冲刺练习阅读(185)
提高英语四级阅读能力的第三条道路
点评新四级Part IV仔细阅读部分
四级冲刺练习阅读(158)
点评新四级PartⅡ快速阅读
从新概念延展到四级阅读镜像蒙太奇法
四级阅读如何轻松拿分
四级冲刺练习阅读(188)
四级冲刺练习阅读(156)
四级冲刺练习阅读(157)
四级冲刺进行时阅读不能一味用题海战术
四级冲刺练习阅读(163)
专家指导新四级快速阅读解题的思路
提高四级阅读能力的第三条道路
四级阅读如何轻松的拿分
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |