The world is going through the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. The process sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at this process and worrying:Wont the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollable anticompetitive force? Theres no question that the big are getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982.Today the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates account for a fastgrowing segment of production in economies that open up and welcome foreign investment. In Argentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability of the world economy. I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M A wave are the same that underlie the globalization process: falling transportation and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers and enlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers demands. All these are beneficial, not detrimental, to consumers. As productivity grows, the worlds wealth increases. Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration wave are scanty. Yet it is hard to imagine that the merger of a few oil firms today could recreate the same threats to competition that were feared nearly a century ago in the U.S., when the Standard Oil trust was broken up. The mergers of telecom companies, such as WorldCom, hardly seem to bring higher prices for consumers or a reduction in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary, the price of communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration is increasingwitness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissanbut it does not appear that consumers are being hurt. Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. A few weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the banking industry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate as lender of last resort with the gigantic banks that are being created? Wont multinationals shift production from one place to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair competition? And should one country take upon itself the role of defending competition on issues that affect many other nations, as in the U.S. vs. Microsoft case? 63.What is the typical trend of businesses today? [A]to take in more foreign funds [B]to invest more abroad [C]to combine and become bigger [D]to trade with more countries 64.According to the author, one of the driving forces behind M A wave is . [A]the greater customer demands [B]a surplus supply for the market [C]a growing productivity [D]the increase of the worlds wealth 65.From paragraph 4 we can infer that . [A]the increasing concentration is certain to hurt consumers [B]WorldCom serves as a good example of both benefits and costs [C]the costs of the globalization process are enormous [D]the Standard Oil trust might have threatened competition 66.Toward the new business wave, the writers attitude can be said to be . [A]optimistic [B]objective [C]pessimistic [D]biased 核心词汇: acquisition n.取得,学到,养成(习惯);获得的东西(ac+quis+ition名词后缀) affiliate v.使隶属(或附属)于n.附属机构,分公司(af+fili+ate) barrier n.栅栏,屏障;障碍(物)(barr栅栏+ier) beneficial a.(to)有利的,有益的(benefic+ial形容词后缀) concentration n.专心,专注;集中,集结;浓度(concentrate+ion名词后缀集中) detrimental a.有害的(detriment损害,危害+al危害的) gigantic a.巨大的,庞大的 hyperactive a.活动过度的(hyper+active活动的);hper前缀超过;过度(h脱落,元音y变u,即为uper),active活跃的。 infringement n.违反, 侵害in否定前缀,fringe(边缘;刘海;穗),ment名词后缀,已经不在边缘侵入内部侵害;infringe(v.侵害)in+fringe massive a.大而重的,厚实的,粗大的;大规模的,大量的(mass+ive形容词后缀) multinational a./n.跨国公司;跨国公司的,multi前缀多(如multiplemulti+ple倍v.加倍;多倍的;倍数),national国家的。 pessimistic a.悲观的pessimist悲观主义者,ic形容词后缀 phenomenon n.现象,稀有现象,珍品,奇迹,杰出人才 resort v.凭借,求助,诉诸n.度假胜地,手段 supervise vt.监督,管理;指导 surpass vt.超过,胜过(sur超过+pass通过并超过胜过) sweep v.扫,打扫;席卷,冲光;扫过,掠过 unsurpassed a.凌驾的, 非常卓越的,超越的un否定前缀,surpass(v.超过)sur前缀超+pass过,ed形容词后缀。 witness n.目击者,证人;证据,证明v.目击,目睹;作证(wit知+ness名词后缀知情者)
暨南大学外国语学院2013年3月BEC中级报名时间
时事资讯:09年奥巴马独立纪念日献词
伊朗提高追杀英国小说家拉什迪的赏金
2011下半年全国国际商务英语二级考试报名时间
中国将派军舰参加在美国夏威夷举行的环太军演
2011年BEC商务英语中级考试大纲:阅读
安倍只有一支箭 The vanishing golf courses that sum up Abeno
时事资讯:一条小鱼可以拯救你的听力?
G20将邀请穷国参与国际税务谈判
叙利亚停火协议将于2月27日起实施
美国智库称中国在华阳礁建雷达塔
河南科技大学2013年BEC中级报名时间
时事资讯:中国网民人数达到3.38亿
时事资讯:美俄就削减核武器达成共识
天津大学研究生院2013年BEC中级报名时间
中国武器出口继续激增 China arms exports continue to surge
剑桥BEC高级考试等级评定说明
云南大学2013年BEC上半年报名时间
时事资讯:伊朗客机坠毁 168人罹难
时事资讯:G8领导人穿上明星大衣 参加峰会不惧风暴
2011年上半年全国国际商务英语(一级)考试报名时间
湖南大学外国语学院2013年3月BEC中级考试报名通知
时事资讯:花旗将与联邦存款保险签署秘密协议
四川外语学院2013年3月BEC中级考试报名通知
联合国一官员称中美就制裁朝鲜达成一致
商务英语就业方向及前景分析
时事资讯:奥巴马获赠巴西队球衣 面露尴尬
澳大利亚大幅增加国防开支
时事资讯:"老妈裤"时尚风波 奥巴马笑称自己老土
时事资讯:奥巴马选大使唯"钱"是举?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |