SAMPLE 8
[数学类]
Computer programmers often remark that computing machines, with a perfect lack of discrimination, will do any foolish thing they are told to do. The reason for this lies, of course, in the narrow fixation of the computing machines intelligence on the details of its own perceptions its inability to be guided by any large context. In a psychological description of the computer intelligence, three related adjectives come to mind: single-minded, literal-minded, and simple-minded. Recognizing this, we should at the same time recognize that this single-mindedness, literal-mindedness, and simple-mindedness also characterizes theoretical mathematics, though to a lesser extent.
Since science tries to deal with reality, even the most precise sciences normally work with more or less imperfectly understood approximations toward which scientists must maintain an appropriate skepticism. Thus, for instance, it may come as a shock to mathematicians to learn that the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom is not a literally correct description of this atom, but only an approximation to a somewhat more correct equation taking account of spin, magnetic dipole, and relativistic effects; and that this corrected equation is itself only an imperfect approximation to an infinite set of quantum field-theoretical equations. Physicists, looking at the original Schrodinger equation, learn to sense in it the presence of many invisible terms in addition to the differential terms visible, and this sense inspires an entirely appropriate disregard for the purely technical features of the equation. This very healthy skepticism is foreign to the mathematical approach.
Mathematics must deal with well-defined situations. Thus, mathematicians depend on an intellectual effort outside of mathematics for the crucial specification of the approximation that mathematics is to take literally. Give mathematicians a situation that is the least bit ill-defined, and they will make it well-defined, perhaps appropriately, but perhaps inappropriately. In some cases, the mathematicians literal-mindedness may have unfortunate consequences. The mathematicians turn the scientists theoretical assumptions that is, their convenient points of analytical emphasis, into axioms, and then take these axioms literally. This brings the danger that they may also persuade the scientists to take these axioms literally. The question, central to the scientific investigation but intensely disturbing in the mathematical context what happens if the axioms are relaxed? is thereby ignored.
The physicist rightly dreads precise argument, since an argument that is convincing only if it is precise loses all its force if the assumptions on which it is based are slightly changed, whereas an argument that is convincing though imprecise may well be stable under small perturbations of its underlying assumptions.
1. The author discusses computing machines in the first paragraph primarily in order to do which of the following?
[A] Indicate the dangers inherent in relying to a great extent on machines.
[B] Illustrate his views about the approach of mathematicians to problem solving.
[C] Compare the work of mathematicians with that of computer programmers.
[D] Provide one definition of intelligence.
2. It can be inferred form the text that scientists make which of the following assumptions about scientific arguments?
[A] The literal truth of the arguments can be made clear only in a mathematical context.
[B] The arguments necessarily ignore the central question of scientific investigation.
[C] The arguments probably will be convincing only to other scientists.
[D] The premises on which the arguments are based may change.
3. According to the text, mathematicians present a risk to scientist for which of the following reasons?
[A] Mathematicians may provide theories that are incompatible with those already developed by scientists.
[B] Mathematicians may define situations in a way that is incomprehensible to scientists.
[C] Mathematicians may convince scientists that theoretical assumptions are facts.
[D] Scientists may come to believe that axiomatic statements are untrue.
4. The author suggests that the approach of physicists to solving scientific problem is which of the following?
[A] Practical for scientific purposes.
[B] Detrimental to scientific progress.
[C] Unimportant in most situations.
[D] Expedient, but of little long-term value.
5. The author implies that scientists develop a healthy skepticism because they are aware that
[A] mathematicians are better able to solve problems than are scientists.
[B] changes in axiomatic propositions will inevitably undermine scientific arguments.
[C] well-defined situations are necessary for the design of reliable experiments.
[D] some factors in most situations must remain unknown.
走马观花看美国:体验世界过山车之最
盘点2011-《时代》年度十大被忽略事件
元宵节传说:点彩灯源于天帝震怒?
北京安检可能减少奥运乐趣
漫画英语之节后综合症
盘点乔布斯一生犯下的六个错误
威廉准新娘订婚白裙网上火热拍卖
给你支招:让你躲过“电梯杀手”的17招
盖茨基金会支持北京“无烟奥运”
双语:新型电脑芯片可让电脑提速20倍
英国弱视妇女捕获近百公斤重鲶鱼
双语:总统女儿晒美钞炫富引众怒
台湾咖啡店标明咖啡因含量卖咖啡
双语:七旬老妇成世界最年长母亲
北京奥运机动车限行措施昨日启动
职称英语考试语法知识复习之动词
双语:中国人均寿命增速有点慢
荷兰新推宠物狗啤酒 主人可与狗共饮
盘点2011年全球最“潮”的工作(双语)
节日双语:美国情人节求婚带动消费
奥运前夕中国加紧空气治理
情人节在即 马尼拉上演浪漫集体拥吻
360度看伦敦 世界最清晰全景图出炉
欧盟报告称立陶宛为“谋杀之都”
麦当劳的奥运“嘉年华”
百万张奥运门票发放全国中小学
现代人压力过大 睡梦中发短信电邮(双语)
热门事件学英语:微博实名制 你怎么看?
美国校车的服务:父母可实时监控(双语)
双语:研究称人类无法分辨男女
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |