SAMPLE 4
[考古学类]
Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.
I would like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavators grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.
You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong.
I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as melekh handles have been found in abundance more than 4,000 examples so far.
The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalogue the finds; as a result, they cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes.
It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it?
1. The primary purpose of the text is to propose
[A] an alternative to museum display of artifacts.
[B] a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession.
[C] a way to distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value.
[D] the governmental regulation of archaeological sites.
2. Which of the following is mentioned in the text as a disadvantage of storing artifacts in museum basements?
[A] Museum officials rarely allow scholars access to such artifacts.
[B] Space that could be better used for display is taken up for storage.
[C] Artifacts discovered in one excavation often become separated from each other.
[D] Such artifacts often remain uncatalogued and thus cannot be located once they are put in storage.
3. The author mentions the excavation in Cyprus to emphasize which of the following points?
[A] Ancient lamps and pottery vessels are less valuable, although more rare, than royal seal impressions.
[B] Artifacts that are very similar to each other present cataloguing difficulties to archaeologists.
[C] Artifacts that are not uniquely valuable, and therefore could be sold, are available in large quantities.
[D] Cyprus is the most important location for unearthing large quantities of salable artifacts.
4. The authors argument concerning the effect of the official sale of duplicate artifacts on illegal excavation is based on which of the following assumptions?
[A] Prospective purchasers would prefer to buy authenticated artifacts.
[B] The price of illegally excavated artifacts would rise.
[C] Computers could be used to trace sold artifacts.
[D] Illegal excavators would be forced to sell only duplicate artifacts.
5. The author anticipates which of the following initial denials of his proposal?
[A] Museum officials will become unwilling to store artifacts.
[B] An oversupply of salable artifacts will result and the demand for them will fall.
[C] Artifacts that would have been displayed in public places will be sold to private collectors.
[D] Illegal excavators will have an even larger supply of artifacts for resale.
“零起点教学”实施近一月学校脚步放缓 问题犹在
算不出7+8 八岁娃想留级遇难题
小学一年级开学两周“账单”逾四千
北京“洋外教”10月底开始需持证上岗
你了解复兴门外一小吗?看看家长怎么说的
2015幼升小指导:如何跨区择校
幼升小:说好的“零起点”教学去哪儿了?
小学家委会进幼儿园推广“零起点”
北京市中小学提前制定课间安全措施
2015幼升小参考:2014海淀区放宽暂住证时间限制
京小学举办艺术教育专场
幼升小老师总结新生21项自理技能:最怕系鞋带
英语字母操:做一套学会26个字母
北京西城幼升小:商用房不能作为入学依据
调查显示:六成家长反对用iPad写作业
2014幼升小入学艺体特长考察面试试题
开学季学区房再现新一轮租赁高峰
北京教委回应“上传学生信息至客户端”
开学三周一年级学生才学“oe”
北京东城八学区专配法律顾问 每周半天"值守"学校
2015幼升小:翠微小学2014年入学报名情况
北京一小学探索将校园屋顶绿化变身科普课堂
家长必读:西城区2015幼升小政策6大改动
京籍家长谈“史上最严”幼升小经历
“放学不许背书包”引争议 政策频出成效如何?
一年级新生状况百出 教师直呼“上班需要勇气”
幼升小:一年级新生进儿艺感受戏剧魅力
家长分享:幼升小入学的那些故事
2015年幼升小入学形式或将更严峻
小学新式作业花样百出 为孩子出彩家长“暗战”
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |