细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪

　　下面GMAT为大家整理了细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪，供考生们参考，以下是详细内容。

　　第一宗罪：无因果联系

　　The author commits a fallacy of over simplification.

　　The line of reasoning is that because A occurred before B/that because A coincided with B, the former is totally responsible for the latter.

　　But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out.

　　For example, perhaps B is caused by C, or perhaps D is the cause of B.

　　If so, then the author cannot justify

　　第二宗罪 Insufficient-sample

　　The argument assumes that A is representative of as a group.

　　However, it supplies no evidence to support this assumption.

　　It is possible that

　　In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the authors conclusion is completely unwarranted.

　　第三宗罪: 错误类比 横向

　　It is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from are applicable to

　　Although there are points of comparison between and , there remain many dissimilarities as well.

　　For example, A , however B

　　Thus, it is likely more difficult for B to

　　第四宗罪 all things are equal纵向

　　The argument suffers from a fallacy of all things are equal in assuming that will remain/have remained unchanged in future/since

　　However, it fails to consider that might, for whatever reason.

　　Since the argument does not account for possibility such as this, it is unconvincing thatwould

　　第五宗罪 Either-Or choice

　　The author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground.

　　However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice.

　　Common sense tells us that adjusting both A and B could produce a better result.

　　第六宗罪 survey is doubtful

　　The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative.

　　The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll or when, where and how the poll was conducted.

　　For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded/if only 10 persons were surveyed and , the conclusion drawn from the survey would be highly suspect.

　　Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.

　　第七宗罪 gratuitous assumption

　　The author depends on gratuitous assumption that

　　However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption.

　　In fact, this is not necessarily the case.

　　For example, it is more likely that

　　Therefore, this arguments is untenable without ruling out such possibility.

　　第八宗罪 One-sidedness

　　The author fails to consider the benefits might bring

　　For example

　　It may turn out that the advantages of outweigh the disadvantages.

　　Since the argument lacks a complete analysis of the situation, the authors conclusion thatcannot be taken seriously.

　　以上就是细数GMAT Argument的8宗罪的详细内容，考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。更多资讯、资料尽在GMAT。最后，GMAT预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得好成绩!