77. The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.
In order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills, our municipality should build a plant for burning trash. An incinerator could offer economic as well as ecological advantages over the typical old-fashioned type of landfill: incinerators can be adapted to generate moderate amounts of electricity, and ash residue from some types of trash can be used to condition garden soil.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid or abate serious public health problems.
Thirdly, the authors implicit claim that incinerators are economically advantageous to landfills is poorly supported. Only two small economic benefits of incineration are mentioned, while the costs associated with either burning trash or switching refuse disposal systems are ignored. In all likelihood, such costs would be significant, and may very well outweigh the economic benefits.
In conclusion, the authors argument provides inadequate justification for switching from one disposal system to the other. As it stands, the argument takes into account only a limited number of benefits from the change, while addressing none of its costs. To better evaluate the argument, we must first examine all the health risks posed by each refuse disposal system and conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis of each system, taking account of the cost of the new system, the cost of the changeover itself, and the expected costs to the community of health problems resulting from each system.
2011年实用口语练习:Arrival 入学报到啦
如何用英语表达“你得减肥了”
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 偷得浮生半日闲ACT 1 - 2
实用口语情景轻松学:我想买个数码摄像机
如何用英文表达“你活该”
英语口语主题:交际英语热门话题47个(6--闲聊)
20条地道实用英语句型(1)
2011年实用口语练习:Join a club 社团活动
英文如何表达“拍马屁”或“巴结”
最常用的26句生活用语
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 感恩节ACT 1 - 1
疯狂口语要素精选 17
实用口语:Singing With Friends
实用口语:你以为你是谁啊?
英语口语-安慰
实用口语情景轻松学:国外理发店实用对话
疯狂口语要素精选 6
大运会必备接待口语
英语口语主题:交际英语热门话题47个(11--表达歉意)
疯狂口语要素精选11
2011年实用口语练习:从头至尾
2011年实用口语练习:表达鼓励的10句英语
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 二度蜜月ACT 3 - 3
中国常犯的英语口语错误
英语口语主题:交际英语热门话题47个(25--竞选和辩论)
趣味英语:搭讪十大妙招
实用口语情景轻松学:Take baby steps 慢慢来
口语情景对话:走遍美国精选 当仁不让 ACT 3 - 2
那些美剧告诉你的事儿
2岁的萝莉口译员Lucy Wang
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |