77. The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.
In order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills, our municipality should build a plant for burning trash. An incinerator could offer economic as well as ecological advantages over the typical old-fashioned type of landfill: incinerators can be adapted to generate moderate amounts of electricity, and ash residue from some types of trash can be used to condition garden soil.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid or abate serious public health problems.
Thirdly, the authors implicit claim that incinerators are economically advantageous to landfills is poorly supported. Only two small economic benefits of incineration are mentioned, while the costs associated with either burning trash or switching refuse disposal systems are ignored. In all likelihood, such costs would be significant, and may very well outweigh the economic benefits.
In conclusion, the authors argument provides inadequate justification for switching from one disposal system to the other. As it stands, the argument takes into account only a limited number of benefits from the change, while addressing none of its costs. To better evaluate the argument, we must first examine all the health risks posed by each refuse disposal system and conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis of each system, taking account of the cost of the new system, the cost of the changeover itself, and the expected costs to the community of health problems resulting from each system.
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第29讲:表格作文(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第14讲:妙用常识及排除法(湖南专用)人教新课标版
浙江省金华市孝顺高级中学高三英语人教版复习:定语从句练习
福建省福州文博中学2017届高三英语人教版:基础检测七
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第10讲:词汇辨析(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第24讲:信息的表述(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第26讲:阅读简答2(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第7讲:三大类从句(湖南专用)人教新课标版
辽宁省抚顺县高中高三英语人教版复习:晨读完形填空
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版:专项语法6-介词及其搭配 77张
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第30讲:要点作文(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第18讲:长难句理解(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第8讲:助动词和特殊句式(湖南专用)人教新课标版
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版必修3:写作进行时-应用文(书信、电子邮件) 26张
辽宁省抚顺县高中高三英语人教版复习:必修4 阶段检测
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版:专项语法4-形容词和副词 102张
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版必修1:写作进行时-记叙文 25张
高三英语备考总复习人教版必修1:Unit 1《Friendship》课件113张
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第16讲:判断词性、词义和词形1(湖南专用)人教新课标版
辽宁省抚顺县高中高三英语人教版语法专项复习:动词不定式的用法
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第22讲:推理判断题(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第23讲:短文和表格信息的理解(湖南专用)人教新课标版
辽宁省抚顺县高中高三英语人教版语法专项复习:it 用法
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第6讲:非谓语动词与with复合结构(湖南专用)人教新课标版
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第19讲:细节理解题(湖南专用)人教新课标版
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版:专项语法2-冠词 95张
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版:专项语法5-动词和动词短语 124张
2017届高考英语二轮复习课件 第15讲:解题步骤(湖南专用)人教新课标版
我喜爱的水果 The Fruits I Like
高三英语备考总复习课件人教版:专项语法1-名词 80张
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |