36. Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic manner depends on: the goals toward which the traits are directed, the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and the job of the individual within an organization.
A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not in consistent per se with personal strength, energy, and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving manner―for example, through pilfering or back stabbing―these traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these traits can motivate other team members, thereby advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and common purpose.
Nevertheless, over-emphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy competition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.
In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement a strong team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, all can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organizations goals.
SAT阅读句子填空题 如何把握句子结构
SAT阅读中的常见文化词条
SAT阅读高分宝典 词汇部分
美国高考SAT阅读测试的应对策略
专家详解SAT阅读的难度
SAT阅读试题举例
跟专家学习SAT阅读长难句
SAT阅读分数换算方法简介
SAT阅读句子填空题解题指导
专家解读如何构建SAT阅读思维 攻克阅读难题
SAT阅读材料:A Brief History of Western Music
SAT阅读词汇 如何注重“质”的挖掘
专家解读SAT阅读考试的注意事项
SAT阅读部分成绩提高有妙招
SAT阅读考试中容易混淆的36组单词
SAT阅读之批判性阅读的做题方法
SAT阅读的题材问题解析
SAT阅读高分宝典 句型部分
SAT阅读词汇总结 语气限定词
复杂的SAT阅读的句式结构难住了多数考生
SAT阅读长难句的理解是关键
SAT阅读应该遵循的基本原则
SAT阅读部分简介
SAT阅读中的Racial Issues 美国种族问题
突破SAT阅读长难句是拿高分的重点
SAT阅读高分宝典 篇章部分
SAT阅读长难句深入学习 5个实例
如何学习SAT阅读长难句
SAT阅读填空题对词汇的要求是什么
如何正确理解SAT阅读长难句
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |