36. Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most commitment and energy, who gets things done.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and commitment is complex; whether they operate in a complementary or antagonistic manner depends on: the goals toward which the traits are directed, the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and the job of the individual within an organization.
A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not in consistent per se with personal strength, energy, and commitment. If exercised in a self-serving manner―for example, through pilfering or back stabbing―these traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these traits can motivate other team members, thereby advancing common goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and common purpose.
Nevertheless, over-emphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A successful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will accomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders, thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a commissioned sales force of highly competitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy competition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion toward common goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.
In sum, individual strength, commitment, and energy can complement a strong team approach; as long as individual autonomy is not undermined, all can operate in a synergistic manner to achieve an organizations goals.
一般将来时的用法
动词let的用法
一般现在时的用法
将来完成时的应用
分词作补语的语法应用
一般现在时代替进行时
一般现在时代替过去时
过去式和现在完成时的区别
过去分词作宾语补足语的语法解析
现在完成时的定义
用一般过去时代替完成时的应用
独立主格结构
连词+分词(短语)的语法应用
不用被动语态的情况
一般现在时表将来的情况
延续动词与瞬间动词的区别
用助动词进行强调句类型
不用进行时的动词
过去进行时的应用
With的复合结构作独立主格
主动形式表示被动意思的情况
动词的语态
分词的时态
分词的语态
一般现在时代替将来时的应用
现在进行时的应用
短语动词的被动语态形式
表示“据说”“相信”的词组
时态一致的语法应用
be to和be going to的区别
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |