An editorial in a weekly news magazine warns that we must quickly increase funding for education in order to remain economically competitive in the world marketplace. The line of reasoning is that the nation will soon face a shortage of engineers because engineers have come from universities, and that our university-age population is shrinking. Moreover, decreasing enrollments in high schools clearly show that this drop in university-age students will continue throughout thedecade. The authors argument is not convincing because it is based on several questionable assumptions.
First, the author assumes that because our university-age population is shrinking, university enrollments will likewise shrink. But even if the number of university-age students is dropping, it is possible that a greater proportion of those students will enter universities. If this percentage were sufficiently large, university enrollments could remain relatively stable. Moreover, even if overall university enrollments did drop, we must further assume that the number of engineering students would likewise drop. However, decreases in overall enrollments do no necessarily result in proportional enrollment decreases in each field of study. If demand for engineers were high, then a larger percentage of university students might study to become engineers, in which case engineering enrollments could increase or remain constant, while those in other major fields of study would drop disproportionately.
An additional assumption is that economic success in the world marketplace depends on the number of engineers produced by our universities. This assumption is simplistic. Professionals in other fields―such as agriculture, banking, and business―may contribute equally to our global success. The author does not explain why the predicted shortage of engineers is more critical than shortages in other fields that might result from shrinking university enrollments. Nor does the author demonstrate that providing more funds for education will correct the predicted shortage of engineers. Even if all of the previous assumptions are accepted, no connection between increased funding and the desired enrollment increase has been established.
In conclusion, the author has failed to make a convincing case for increased funding for education. Before we accept the conclusion, the author must provide evidence that we face a critical shortage of engineers, and that increased funding will have direct bearing on correcting this shortage. As it stands, both these claims rest on unwarranted assumptions.
54.
In this editorial the author argues for the imposition of strict pricing regulations in order to prevent citrus growers from continued inflation of prices of citrus fruit. The need for such regulation is supported by the authors contention that citrus growers have been unnecessarily raising prices of citrus fruit in the past. The evidence for this allegation is the fact that theprice of lemons has increased from 15 cents per pound to over a dollar per pound during the preceding 11-year period, even though weather conditions have been favorable to citrus production in all but one of those years. This argument is flawed in two important respects.
First and foremost, the author assumes that the only factor that influences the price of citrus fruit is the weather. Other factors―such as monetary inflation, increased distribution and labor costs, or alterations in supply and demand conditions―are ignored as possible sources for the increase. The charge that citrus growers have unnecessarily raised prices can be sustained only if these and other possible factors can be completely ruled out as contributing to the price increases. Since the author fails to address these factors, the recommendation calling for strict pricing regulations can be dismissed out-of-hand as frivolous.
Second, the author assumes that the only way to combat increased prices is through government intervention. In a free-enterprise system many other means of affecting the pricing of goods are available. For example, boycotting a product and thereby influencing supply and demand conditions of the commodity is an effective means of influencing the price of the product. In a free market economy the government should consider regulating prices only when all other means to rectify the problem have been exhausted.
In conclusion, the authors argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to show that the only factor influencing the price increases is the growers desire for increased profits.
精选英语美文阅读:给幸福一个机会
英语美文30篇系列之15
心灵鸡汤:机会如空气 请善待机会
英语美文 永远的朋友
英语标准美文100
英语名篇名段背诵精华58
精美英文欣赏:学会生活在现实中
英文短篇小说-The Purple Of The Balkan Kings
英语美文:给年轻人的忠告(双语)
英语美文欣赏:SHMILY 知道我有多么爱你
爱是一根线
双语散文:Owen: Beyond my dreams
英语美文欣赏:一杯牛奶
英语短篇美文欣赏:黄昏之美(带翻译)
英语美文欣赏:To Any Service Member
英语美文故事
浪漫英文情书精选:My Wonderful & Loving Girl我可爱的女孩
英文短篇小说欣赏- 灌木丛中的王子
英语美文欣赏:通往幸福的阶梯
英语美文欣赏:百万英镑(中文)
心灵鸡汤:成长的树根
双语散文:哥哥的心愿
心灵鸡汤:AIDS患者:给我穿红色衣服
双语散文:减轻精神压力的三种有效方法
美文欣赏:做人的十条规则
心灵鸡汤:坚强的海伦・凯勒
情人节英文诗背诵:你是我整个世界
双语散文:大学第一课
双语散文:我崇拜的心上人
英语美文30篇系列之30
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |