5. All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Support your views with reasons and/or specific examples drawn from your own work or school experiences, your observations, or your reading.
Which is a more productive method of performing a group task: allowing all group members to share in the decision making, duties and responsibilities, or appointing one member to make decisions, delegate duties and take responsibility? The speakers opinion is that the first method is always the best one. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances, as illustrated by two very different examples.
A jury in a criminal trial is good example of a group in which shared decision-making, duties, and responsibility is the most appropriate and effective way to get the job done. Each member of the jury is on equal footing with the others. While one person is appointed to head the jury, his or her function is to act as facilitator, not as leader. To place ultimate authority and responsibility on the facilitator would essentially be to appoint a judge, and to thereby defeat the very purpose of the jury system.
By way of contrast, a trauma unit in a hospital is a case in which one individual should assume responsibility, delegate duties and make decisions. In trauma units, split-second decisions are inherently part of the daily routine, and it is generally easier for one person to make a quick decision than for a team to agree on how to proceed. One could argue that since decisions in trauma units are typically life-and-death ones, leaving these decisions to one person is too risky. However, this argument ignores the crucial point that only the most experienced individuals should be trusted with such a burden and with such power; leaving decisions to inexperienced group members can jeopardize a patients very life.
In conclusion, I agree that in some situations the best way to accomplish a task is through teamwork-sharing responsibility, duties and decision making. However, in other situations, especially those where quick decisions are necessary or where individual experience is critical, the most effective means is for one individual to serve as leader and assume ultimate responsibility for completing the job.
国家电网挺进澳大利亚
True Nobility
香港路边空气污染状况更趋严重
财政悬崖逼近之际,奥巴马将返回华盛顿
开罗解放广场爆发反总统示威
世界末日 如何投资?
印度外包公司把就业岗位送下乡
廉价背后的代价
The Best Day Of My Life
巴基斯坦自杀爆炸手造成23人丧生
巴黎春天收购香港麒麟珠宝
英国FSA收紧对海外银行监管
心香一瓣
美国需要一个整合的商务部
The difference between love and like
分析:台湾走向募兵制
蒙古国政局不稳 拖累新发债券行情
标普将英国评级展望调为“负面”
只要你幸福就好
梦想 你心中永远的激情
壹传媒出售台湾业务
生活因为希望才快乐
美国波特兰商场发生枪击案 至少3人死亡
请病假的艺术
放弃是一种美丽
万向集团竞购A123获胜
Thanks for everything
人民币国际交易中心争夺战
苹果的优势在于软件
工人福利应让采购商买单
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |